Business Databases in Libraries

Published on December 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 39 | Comments: 0 | Views: 282
of 33
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

This article was downloaded by: [UNSW Library] On: 11 September 2011, At: 23:29 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wbfl20

Access to Business Research Resources Through Academic Library Websites: A Survey
John C. Gottfried
a a

Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA

Available online: 29 Dec 2010

To cite this article: John C. Gottfried (2010): Access to Business Research Resources Through Academic Library Websites: A Survey, Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16:1, 1-32 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2011.530852

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16:1–32, 2011 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0896-3568 print / 1547-0644 online DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2011.530852

Access to Business Research Resources Through Academic Library Websites: A Survey
JOHN C. GOTTFRIED
Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

This study is an examination of access to business research resources through academic library websites, including research databases, catalog services, research guides, and business librarians. The websites of 114 academic libraries serving top business programs in the United States were studied. Results reveal a wide range of access to business research databases among the schools studied (anywhere from 11 to 100 business databases available). More than 95% of the schools provided business research guides, and nearly all schools provided at least some contact information for business librarians. KEYWORDS website, business, research, library, librarians, academic, database

INTRODUCTION
Electronic access to library resources has remained among the most pressing topics facing academic libraries in recent years, and there is every reason to believe it will continue to do so in the years to come. For distance learners, electronic access to library resources may be the only access they have. Even among resident students (and not a few faculty), the library website is, for all intents and purposes, the library. No effort should be spared, therefore, in determining how much material is really available electronically, how it is being delivered, and the degree to which libraries supply appropriate instructional guides and tutorials to help users make the most of these costly resources.
Submitted: 24 August 2009; Revision Submitted: 16 November 2009; Accepted: 3 November 2009. Address correspondence to John Gottfried, Business Librarian, Cravens Library, Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd. #11067, Bowling Green, KY 42101-1067. E-mail: [email protected] 1

2

J. C. Gottfried

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

There are few areas in the academic community in which the increasing prominence of electronic resources is more apparent than in schools of business. It has been recognized for some years that business students are among the heaviest users of academic library reference services and resources (Littlejohn & Talley, 1990). If anything, current-day business students are more likely than their predecessors to perceive library research as important and are more likely to have had library instruction (Senior, Wu, Martin, & Mellinger, 2009). The reasons for this are relatively obvious—business resources are often extremely time-sensitive and therefore can be delivered and updated more effectively in electronic format. Furthermore, many business students, particularly those in graduate programs, hold full-time jobs and have family responsibilities. These students welcome—in fact, demand— easy remote access to library resources (Atkinson & Figueroa, 1997). With the academic library’s responsibility for acquiring and delivering electronic business reference resources, however, come difficult challenges. Librarians need to determine, for instance, how just how many of these resources are required to adequately serve their academic communities. Libraries need to ensure that these resources are delivered in a manner that maximizes benefits. Finally, adequate instruction must be provided for these complicated systems, particularly in such a way that reaches all of the library’s users. The first step in providing this level of service is finding out just where libraries really stand— in other words, the necessity exists for at least a rudimentary measurement of the electronic business resources being supplied at this time. The objective of the current study is, therefore, to accumulate data and report on the number and types of business research resources currently offered through academic library websites. This information can provide a useful set of benchmarks that will help to establish standards by which all libraries can judge their own level of access to electronic business research resources. The current study also examines the methods by which these resources were delivered and promoted, and the availability of instruction or assistance through the library websites.

LITERATURE REVIEW
As the prevalence and prominence of electronic resources continues to grow in academic libraries, it is not surprising that there is a large and increasing body of research in this area. Blummer (2007) provided an excellent review of past research related to academic library websites, pointing out that most studies have focused on one of three aspects: (1) design, (2) usability and navigation, and (3) content and services available through the site. Kirkwood (2000) used a methodology similar to that of the current study to examine the organization and structure of business-related academic library websites, noting at that time a move toward uniformity, but concluding, “the most

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

3

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

consistent thing discovered by this study is that there remains a large amount of inconsistency across sites” (p. 36). In a 2009 update of this study, however, Lyons and Kirkwood found “marked improvement” (p. 345) overall. Other writers have published reviews of specific business databases, as in Oulanov’s (2008) study of student perceptions of EBSCO’s Business Source Premier, or have attempted to provide a broad review of a large number of available online business resources (e.g., Golderman & Connolly, 2005). The current study seeks to further existing research by examining the availability of electronic business resources across academic library websites of leading business programs in the United States. The practice of surveying services and materials available on library websites to determine their number, effectiveness, design, and content is a common one. To examine the online availability of policies toward nonaffiliated users of library resources, Coffta and Schoen (2000), and later Barsun (2003) reviewed the websites of academic libraries in the United States affiliated with the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). Detlor and Lewis (2006) used a similar method to review services and resources available through academic library websites. Among their key findings was a lack of “high-level customization and integration expected of commercial search engines” (p. 254). These researchers pointed out that academic libraries must be prepared to meet the standards of technological proficiency presented by Web search engines like Google and Yahoo. They used the results of their study to provide a series of practical recommendations for the improvement of online services through academic library websites. The current study seeks to expand this research to the specific needs of business researchers.

Business Research Databases and Electronic Journals
Among the most important business reference resources drawing users to academic library websites are electronic article indexes, and full-text electronic access to articles. The literature surrounding electronic journals is predictably vast. O’Hara (2007a) offered a detailed annotated bibliography and an excellent review of literature (2007b). Research continues unabated in such areas as migrating from print to electronic journals (Fortini, 2007), insuring access to electronic journals over time (Crawford, 2008), and a continuing examination of patterns in electronic journal usage (e.g., Frank, 2007). Several studies have moreover, reviewed or studied specific business research databases, such as Hahn’s (2009) review of RMA’s eStatement Studies database, Watkins’s (2009) review of Westlaw Business, or Oulanov’s (2008) study of Business Source Premier, in which students rated the database highly in terms of several criteria including efficiency, user effort, adaptability, and retrieval features.

4

J. C. Gottfried

Electronic Books in Business
Electronic Books (e-books) accounted for 11% of the book acquisition budgets of academic libraries as of late 2006, and that figure is estimated to increase to 20% by 2011 (Primary Research Group, 2008). As e-books gain in distribution and acceptance, researchers have been quick to study many aspects of electronic book use and perception in academic libraries. Bunkell and Dyas-Correia (2009), for example, compared the effectiveness of e-books and print books, finding that e-books hold the advantage in such areas as accessibility and ease of searching. Other researchers have focused on perceptions and attitudes toward e-books, finding that students (Gregory, 2008) and faculty (Carlock, 2008) express a dislike for e-books and a stated preference for print books, though Walton reported in 2007 that actual usage statistics indicate broader acceptance of e-books than is implied by attitudes expressed by students and faculty. Several recent studies have researched access to e-books across academic libraries. Dinkelman and Stacy-Bates (2007) surveyed access to e-books at 111 academic library websites, finding that more than one half of the libraries dedicated a separate web page to e-books, but the content and quality of the pages varied considerably. Hutton (2008) tracked the availability of 10 specific e-books through the online catalogs of 10 academic libraries serving distance learners, finding only three titles available through any of the libraries. She pointed out the importance of developing electronic collections and improving access to them. Only a few researchers have examined e-books as related to specific disciplines. Ugaz (2008), for example, studied electronic access to medical textbooks, whereas Levine-Clark (2007) looked at usage and user perceptions of e-books in the humanities at the University of Denver. The current study seeks to extend existing research by determining how many top academic business libraries provide efficient, easy-to-understand access to businessrelated e-books through their online catalogs or websites.

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Subject Guides and Tutorials
Subject guides and tutorials are common instructional tools offered through most academic library websites in one form or another. Given their ubiquity, however, it is surprising to find that there remains a pronounced lack of consensus on the definitions of these terms. As far back as 1997, Brandt, for example, found that the term tutorial “was applied to everything from a page with a list of hyperlinks/URLs with no descriptions, to outlines used in presentations, to what amounted to very lengthy articles” (p. 45). Hrycaj (2005) takes a promising approach in adapting an existing definition of tutorials from computer science—a “program that provides instruction for the use of a system of software”—and broadening it to include “virtually

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

5

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

anything” (p. 211). This definition recognizes the reality of the practical use of the term—it is used for just about any sort of instructional guide tacked onto a library web page. The definition of the term subject guide appears even more slippery. Many authors avoid making hazy distinctions among guides and tutorials by adopting a method similar to Lyons and Kirkwood (2009), who included both under the single term instructional element, then examined the variety of different terms used to describe them. Tchangalova and Feigley (2008) may, however, have best defined the difference by declaring that the “main idea of a guide is to provide a starting point for the researcher” (Definition section, para. 3). The current study follows this approach by identifying tutorials as brief instructional guides to any library process or resource, whereas subject guides (under any of their many names) provide tips or advice on beginning research on a given topic or subject. Much has been written about subject guides and tutorials. Courtois, Higgins, and Kapur (2005), for example, studied perceptions of the usefulness of subject guides at George Washington University, asking a single question—Was this guide helpful?—and receiving mixed responses. Similarly, Lindsay, Cummings, and Johnson (2006) assessed student learning from online tutorials, finding that many students were highly confident that they had learned from tutorials but underperformed on practical tests of the skills taught in them. Other writers described methods of creating and implementing subject guides and tutorials, such as Tim Wales who described the use of Captivate software (2005) and content management systems (2008) to create subject guides and tutorials. Recently, a research group at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Library studied online tutorials at 126 medical library websites to determine in some detail the format and design of medical library tutorials offered online (Anderson, Wilson, Yeh, Phillips, & Livingston, 2008). The current study uses a similar method to examine the availability and form of business-related library subject guides and tutorials.

Business Librarians
The last of the business reference resources examined was access to a business librarian. As the prevalence of electronic resources continues to grow, and as the number of reference questions continues to fall (Banks & Pracht, 2008), some may begin to question the value of highly specialized, costly library professionals and faculty. Fitzpatrick, Moore, and Lang (2008) found, however, that academic library users prefer to deal with qualified reference librarians. This supports the results of a recent study on scholarly communities and the relationship of researchers and librarians in which scholars expressed the need for traditional forms of scholarly communication, even as a greater proportion of their scholarly work and interaction was performed online (Genoni, Merrick, & Willson, 2006). Granfield and Robertson (2008)

6

J. C. Gottfried

concluded that the reference desk is still the most popular “live” reference resource, and that “virtual reference” (synchronous, online “chat” or “instant messaging” with a reference librarian [p. 45]) was preferred by a significant number of users who worked off campus, especially graduate students. No existing research has, however, been devoted to the study of the prevalence of electronic access to librarians. The current study seeks to determine if and how the academic libraries serving top business programs provide online access to business librarians.

METHOD
From November 2008 through January 2009, data were gathered on the number and types of business research resources available electronically through the campus libraries of 116 U.S. colleges and universities. The campuses chosen for inclusion were those with the most highly rated business programs. The research resources provided by these top business programs, taken as a group, provide a viable benchmark of the current state of electronic access to academic business research resources. Top-rated programs were identified using lists published by leading business periodicals such as Forbes (Settimi & Badenhausen, 2007), U.S. News & World Report (2008), the Wall Street Journal (Srivastava, 2008), and Business Week (2008a, 2008b). A complete list of schools studied may be found in Appendix A. For each school chosen, data were collected on the availability of business resources through the online library catalogs and library research databases. The availability of instructional support online was also examined, including subject guides, tutorials, and librarians specializing in business reference and research. Results are not reported by institution—it was not the objective of the current study to compare or pass judgment on specific colleges or universities, but to use their collective judgment to provide a broad snapshot of the relative availability of electronic business research resources through academic libraries at this time. Where appropriate, however, specific web pages or online resources representing a unique or exceptional approach to providing online business research resources have been identified.
Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Databases and Other Electronic Resources Chosen for Inclusion
The databases included in the current study were drawn from the offerings of the largest U.S. academic libraries (Kyrillidou & Bland, 2008), including Harvard University, Yale University, the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne, and Columbia University. All business databases available through these top schools were compiled into

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

7

a single master list. In general, this list was limited to business-related, paid resources open only to authorized campus users, but exceptions were made for resources that showed up repeatedly on the libraries’ lists of business databases (e.g., Google Scholar). The final list consisted of 209 databases and may be viewed at the end of the Protocol for the Business Website Survey (Appendix B).

Business Resources Through the Library Catalog
The current study concerns itself with online library catalogs only insofar as they relate to electronic access to business resources. Toward this end each library catalog was checked to determine whether users could do a subject search of business books, and, if so, whether there were instructions or tips on how to do so. The catalogs were also examined for access to a detailed help guide or tutorial on the catalog search page. The site was then searched for obvious methods of finding electronic business books (e-books). Many users employ the library catalog to find access to periodicals, so each site was reviewed to determine if users could check for access to business periodicals through the online library catalog, whether they could check for all formats (paper, microform, electronic), and whether they could link directly to articles, or at least to databases, through the catalog. Finally, the library websites were examined to see if they fulfilled a role common in public libraries, but sadly lacking on academic library websites—providing reading lists or lists of recommended works for business students. It quickly became obvious that academic libraries do not, as a rule, supply such services, so the study was limited to determining whether each site offered at least a list of new titles by subject.

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Business Subject Guides and Tutorials
For the purposes of this study a subject guide was defined as a library instructional guide focused on a single academic discipline—specifically, in this case, business and/or economics. A similarly vague but practical distinction was used for the term tutorial—this refers to a library instructional guide focused on performing a particular function (e.g., accessing electronic materials from off-campus) or using a specific tool (such as a specific research database).

Business Librarians
To evaluate the accessibility of business librarians through academic library websites, it was first determined whether each of the libraries identified their

8

J. C. Gottfried

business research specialists online at all (some did not), and, if so, the number of business librarians was recorded. The sites were then examined for each of four common forms of contact information: telephone number, e-mail address, office location, and instant messaging address. To assess the degree of personalization of business librarians on the library website, four methods librarians commonly use to express their personalities online were identified: photographs of the librarian, biographies, web pages on the library website, and links to separate websites for the librarians.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

The websites of 116 top business programs were examined; 114 of them offered some form of online access to the campus library. The average undergraduate enrollment at the schools selected was 15,565, whereas enrollment in graduate business programs averaged 630 (see Table 1). Of the schools studied, 47 (40.5%) had separate library websites for business research. Most of these sites offer basic information for business researchers but link to the main library site for key services like catalogs and research databases. Particularly interesting is the emergence of hybrid “virtual” business libraries and information centers. The University of Florida (2008), for example, offers “Business Library 2.0,” an outstanding source of business research information that includes dozens of detailed guides and tutorials, as well as easy access to library catalogs and databases.

Linking to Business Research Databases
There is no doubt that electronic access to academic journals, books, and other research materials stands among the most vital services available through academic library websites. An evident, expedient path to these resources is, therefore, of critical importance. As shown in Table 2, most academic libraries (88.8%) provided a direct link to databases from the front page
TABLE 1 Average Size of Programs (Size of Program in Terms of Total Enrollment) Undergraduate (Total) Total number of schools Schools with no business program Mean FTE Median FTE Minimum FTE Maximum FTE 114 2 15,565 13,854 1,785 53,298 Graduate Business 116 0 630 489 27 3,291

Note. FTE = Full-time enrollment. Total enrollment = All degree-seeking students, obtained from college and university websites where possible or from the Princeton Review (2008).

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

9

TABLE 2 Access to Business Research Databases and Journal Articles Through Academic Library Websites Frequency Direct link to databases from front page Obvious path to databases from front page Business databases listed separately Business subtopics for databases listed Databases annotated Tutorials available on database list page Federated search system 103 98 106 57 104 25 39 % 88.8 84.5 91.4 49.1 89.7 21.6 33.6

of the library website, and the path from front page to research databases was usually obvious and convenient (84.5%). Almost all of the libraries offered a separate list of business-related research databases, and about one half (49.1%) also supplied a list of databases broken down into business subtopics (e.g., finance, marketing, and human resources). Many of the libraries (89.7%) also provided brief annotations for each of the databases, so that inexperienced users would be able to quickly identify the most appropriate resources for the task at hand. Relatively few libraries (21.6%), however, offered links to database instruction or tutorials from the list of databases. This seems a lost opportunity to provide instruction and guidance at exactly the point where online and distance users could most benefit from it. Nor does the creation of such tutorials need to be a time-consuming process—many of the libraries that did provide instruction simply created links to instruction materials provided by database vendors, or even to materials posted through other colleges and universities. It was also interesting to note that one third of libraries (33.6%) possessed some type of federated search system, though, as noted above, only 12.1% used this federated search system to allow article searches from within the library catalog. On the face of it, this seems another lost opportunity to provide a significant benefit: the sort of “one-stop” search users have come to expect in the age of Google. It is possible, however, that problems in the design or implementation of federated search systems might be impeding their acceptance on a broader scale. For example, a notice had been posted to one leading university’s library website, warning that the federated search system was “working inconsistently.”

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Availability of Business Research Databases Through Academic Library websites
The schools in the current study provided their campuses with an average of 36.3 business research databases. The range was wide, from a minimum of 11 to a maximum of 100. The 25 business research databases most often

10

J. C. Gottfried

TABLE 3 Twenty-five Databases Most Frequently Included on Academic Library Lists of Business Research Resources Research Database LexisNexis Academic Business Source (various) EconLit ABI/Inform (various) Mergent Online Hoover’s STAT-USA Factiva Standard & Poor’s (various) Regional Business News Value Line LexisNexis Statistical JSTOR Source OECD Bus & Company Resource Ctr. Intl Financial Statistics Wall Street Journal World Dev. Indicators OL Mintel Reports Reference USA Conference Board Global Market Insight PsycINFO Academic Search (various) CCH Tax Research Network # 105 98 93 76 76 74 73 70 70 66 62 58 57 57 55 55 54 51 50 50 49 47 47 45 45 % 90.5 84.5 80.2 65.5 65.5 63.8 62.9 60.3 60.3 56.9 53.4 50.0 49.1 49.1 47.4 47.4 46.6 44.0 43.1 43.1 42.2 40.5 40.5 38.8 38.8

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

included in academic library lists are shown in Table 3. There were few surprises—most of the databases at the top of the list are familiar, respected names. A complete list, including all databases found on four or more lists of suggested business research databases, may be found in Appendix C.

Electronic Books
Because their content and distribution is so different from that of the other databases, e-book vendors were tracked separately. Totals are shown in Table 4, but results should be regarded with suspicion, as the choices made by specific libraries to include or exclude e-book vendors from the list of business research databases appears to be entirely arbitrary. Nonetheless, the presence of e-book vendor NetLibrary on the lists of business databases for more than one fourth of the academic libraries in the study does seem to indicate growing support and acceptance of e-books by business researchers and academic librarians.

Business Resources Through Academic Websites TABLE 4 E-book Vendors on Business Database Lists # NetLibrary Ebrary Safari Tech Books Books 24 × 7 Springer E-book Collection 29 19 16 11 1

11

% 25.4 16.7 14.0 9.6 0.9

Business Research Through Academic Library Catalogs
General results of our examination of the availability of business resources through online library catalogs are shown in Table 5. Virtually all library websites studied allowed users to locate books by subject. Only a little more than one half of the libraries (52.6%), however, explained how to do this in an obvious way on the main catalog page, though almost all libraries supplied some type of catalog tutorial or help function somewhere. It was encouraging to find that a wide majority of academic libraries (69.0%) did provide an obvious and effective means of searching for e-books by subject through the catalog. The University of Texas at Dallas (2009) provided a highly effective model for e-book access—a link on the front library web page took the user to an e-book web page, which offered an e-book search and links to a number of other resources. Every library catalog studied provided information on the availability of periodicals and journals, and all but one included access information about all common periodical formats (paper, microform, and electronic). Only 14 libraries (12.1%) currently enable users to search for articles within the catalog search area. Most libraries providing this service appear to do so using a federated search function. The federated search system is one in which a single search box is used to search multiple sources—through several databases, for instance, and in some cases the library catalog as well.
TABLE 5 Business Research Resources Through Academic Library Catalogs Item Catalog: Search by subject Subject search explained Catalog tutorial available Can search e-books by subject Can search for serials Catalog: Serials in all common formats Article search from catalog Databases linked from catalog New titles readily available by subject # 113 61 106 80 114 111 14 109 36 % 97.4 52.6 91.4 69.0 99.1 95.7 12.1 94.0 31.0

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

12

J. C. Gottfried

TABLE 6 Access to Business Subject Guides and Tutorials Item Business subject guides available Subject guide offers business subtopics Tutorials available (any topic) Separate business tutorials Tutorials included with subject guides Instruction for different types of users # 111 103 82 32 21 31 % 95.7 88.8 70.7 27.6 18.1 26.7

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

In this way the user can, in principle, find periodicals, books, and specific articles on a given topic, all with a single search. As mentioned previously, most academic libraries do not provide readings lists or suggestions for their users. The Bentley University Library (2009) is a praiseworthy exception, offering lists of popular books and new books, audiobooks, DVDs, and music. Some libraries (31.0%) did, however, offer a searchable listing of new titles, normally through the library catalog.

Access to Business Subject Guides and Tutorials Through Academic Library Websites
Business subject guides were available through 95.7% of the library websites in our sample (see Table 6). Almost all of these (88.8%) provided online help for a number of subtopics, such as researching industries or performing marketing research. Nearly all of them were offered in web format (HTML), with only a few isolated examples of downloadable options like PDF or MS Word documents. Most of the subject guides consisted largely of lists of research databases recommended for specific research topics, though many also included links to open web resources, research tips and advice, and links to other library or campus resources. Some librarians linked blogs or personal web pages to the subject guides. As shown in Table 6, a large number of schools (70.7%) offered tutorials on practical skills like using specific databases. Only a little more than one fourth of the schools in our sample, though, offered any form of online instruction targeted to specific user groups, such as new students, graduate students, or distance learners. As shown in Table 7, most academic libraries refer to these guides as either “research guides” (the most popular term) or “subject guides,” but many of the libraries used any of an eclectic variety of alternatives, including creative offerings like “help sheets,” “research starting points,” and “gateways to information.” These results are roughly in accord with similar observations in Lyons and Kirkwood (2009); differences may be attributed to previously described differences in the way the two studies defined guides and tutorials (see the Subject Guides and Tutorials section of the Literature Review).

Business Resources Through Academic Websites TABLE 7 Term Used for Subject Guides # Research guide Subject guide Research by subject Library guide Guide Research help Pathfinder Other N/A 51 28 6 2 2 1 1 23 2

13

% 44.0 24.1 5.2 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.9 19.8 1.7

Business Librarians
Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

With few exceptions, most of the academic libraries identified their business librarians somewhere on the library web page (see Table 8). The average number of business librarians at each library was 2.28. Over 90% of the schools provided some form of contact information for their business librarians. The most popular forms of contact were telephone and e-mail. Less than one half of the schools offered an office location for the librarians, though many suggested a visit to the library reference desk for face-to-face research assistance. Particularly interesting is the emergence of instant messaging, with just short of 20% of the librarians offering either an instant messaging interface on their subject guides or web pages, or instant messaging addresses in the their contact information. Although most libraries provided some form of contact information for librarians, it must be noted that on many of the library websites it was very difficult to find this information. Users were often required to drill down through several layers of unfathomable website terminology before finally ending up with a list of librarians. Another obstacle to accessing business librarians was a regrettable lack of consensus regarding the title used to
TABLE 8 Access to Business Librarians Through Library Website # Business librarian(s) noted on website Business librarian(s) identified by name Some kind of contact information for business librarian 1. E-mail 2. Telephone 3. Office location 4. Instant message (IM) Business librarian personalized in some way 1. Photograph 2. Biography 3. Web page 4. Website 109 108 107 103 103 47 21 57 54 23 18 2 % 94.0 93.1 92.2 88.8 88.8 40.5 18.1 49.1 46.6 19.8 15.5 1.7

14

J. C. Gottfried

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

FIGURE 1 Titles used to identify business librarians (by frequency)

describe them. As shown in Figure 1, terms like “Subject Librarian,” “Subject Specialist,” and “Business Librarian” were common, but the most numerous classification was “other.” This broad class included an arcane selection of titles including “Author,” “Library Technician,” “User Education,” “Library Staff,” and various administrative titles. Such terms may be confusing even to experienced users; they are likely to present a real challenge to incoming students or transfers—precisely those users, in other words, most in need of assistance. Perhaps as important as providing electronic contact to librarians is providing a bit of personality and a friendly face online. Here academic libraries often fall short, with less than one half (49.1%) providing any sort of personalization of the librarian (see Table 8). Personalization most often consisted of a simple photo posted on the subject guide or librarian staff list (46.6%), though some librarians posted biographies, r´ sum´ s, web pages, e e and, in a couple of cases, a link to a separate website maintained by the librarian.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In an age when the utility of the library as an institution is questioned openly and often, 61% of our college students use the library website, 58% use electronic journals and magazines, and 44% use online databases at least once a month (De Rosa et al., 2005). These figures will certainly continue to grow in the future. It is critical, then, that business libraries have useful, up-to-date data on the number and types of business research resources being supplied through academic library websites. By surveying 114 of the academic library

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

15

websites serving the leading business programs in the United States, the current study yields relevant benchmarks and standards to guide and assess the provision of research resources at all academic libraries. Regarding the sheer volume of resources offered, perhaps the most interesting finding is the large range in the number of business research databases offered to the students of leading business programs—from a low of 11, to a high of 100. It is apparent, then, that there is considerable latitude for academic libraries to mold their holdings to fit the specific needs of the institution. Consider that information was collected on the availability of more than 200 business research databases, and no single school provided more than one half that number of research databases to their students. Overall, the results of the current study indicate that academic libraries supply an outstanding selection of resources online, though in some cases the arrangement and presentation of resources does not seem to be optimized for the convenience of the user. One of the most popular resources offered by academic libraries, for example, is access to research databases. On average, libraries provide access to more than 36 business databases. Nearly all of the libraries studied offered an easy, obvious path to an annotated list of databases through the library website, and nearly all provided a list of databases chosen specifically for business research. Less than one fourth of the sites, however, offered instruction on the use of these complicated resources anywhere near the links themselves. A user would, in other words, have to search through the site again to find help in using a database. Similarly, online catalogs provide easy access to books and serials, and it is relatively easy to limit the search to business topics. Less than one third of the libraries studied, however, posted new titles on the website, and only a couple of libraries provided recommended reading lists for business students. Such results provide evidence of the considerable effort expended by academic libraries to offer the best research resources to their users, while indicating that greater effort should be expended in helping their users become knowledgeable and comfortable with electronic resources and their contents. If such shortcomings exist, however, they do not appear to be due to a lack of effort. Virtually all libraries, for instance, offer some kind of business subject guide, and nearly all provide specific research guides for business subtopics such as accounting or company research. At the same time, only a little more than one fourth of the libraries have taken the extra step to provide instruction cultured to different levels of users (e.g., graduate, undergraduate, and visitors). Additionally, any attempt to locate these subject guides is hampered by a lack of consistency in the terms used to describe them. The same pattern may be observed in the methods of contacting business librarians provided through academic library websites. Most libraries provide contact information for the business librarian—usually through the

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

16

J. C. Gottfried

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

relatively traditional formats of e-mail and telephone. Less than 20%, however, have taken the next step by offering access through such updated applications as instant messaging. Among those sites that personalize their librarians in some manner, most do so with a traditional photo, whereas only a small percentage offer some type of electronic introduction, such as a web page or site. It is unclear, though, whether this is because librarians are reluctant to experiment with new methods and approaches, or whether they are simply too short of time to take them on. Academic librarians face a daunting struggle to remain current in their knowledge of an endless parade of new research databases, vendor interfaces, web design principles, and software applications. If keeping up with all of this is challenging to library professionals, though, how much more confusing must the library website be for the library’s users? Although a comprehensive set of recommendations concerning online access to business research resources is well beyond the scope of the current study, a few fundamental points stand out: 1. Leading academic libraries must give careful thought to research databases they offer their users. Quantity alone is not the issue—many top business schools offer a limited selection, whereas some programs that are not highly ranked offer a large number of research databases. The key is a careful, judicious selection process. 2. The libraries studied tend to be very strong in offering resources but somewhat limited in helping students understand how to use these complicated systems. Instructional materials should be posted in obvious proximity to the electronic resources themselves. 3. Lack of consistency in the terms used to describe various electronic resources continues to be a stumbling block for academic library websites. 4. Lack of consistency in the terms used to describe business librarians on the websites leads to confusions for users. 5. Although most leading libraries expend considerable time and money recruiting highly qualified business librarians, online access to these valuable personnel could be improved. More up-to-date modes of communication (such as instant messaging, texting, and others) should be investigated. These recommendations arise from the results of the current study, but more research is needed. We need stronger insights into the effectiveness of the content and design of academic library websites. Website usability studies can help reveal the way in which users navigate websites, which could help improve academic website design. Focus groups and interviews could help to clarify the terms and vocabulary that would make the most sense to the greatest number of users, improving the wording on the websites. Finally, in-depth surveys of classroom assignments and faculty research needs could help guide decisions on appropriate database selection and content.

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

17

Electronic resources will continue to grow in importance and as a percentage of the acquisitions budgets of academic libraries into the foreseeable future. The skills of academic library faculty, staff, and administration in managing these costly commodities must, therefore, continue to grow at a similarly aggressive rate. A necessary step in this direction is the provision of usable data on which to base rational decision making, and the current study has, perhaps, made some humble contribution in this area. By basing decisions on reliable, up-to-date data, we stand the best chance of meeting our unpredictable future in an effective, confident, and responsible manner.

REFERENCES
Anderson, R. P., Wilson, S. P., Yeh, F., Phillips, B., & Livingston, M. B. (2006). Topics and features of academic medical library tutorials. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 27, 406–418. Atkinson, J. D., III, & Figueroa, M. (1997). Information seeking behavior of business students: A research study. Reference Librarian, 58, 59–73. Banks, J., & Pracht, C. (2008). Reference desk staffing trends: A survey. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 48(1), 54–59. Barsun, R. (2003). Library Web pages and policies toward “outsiders”: Is the information there? Public Services Quarterly, 1(4), 11–27. Bentley University Library. (2009). New books. Retrieved from http://library. bentley.edu/libraryservices/newbooks.asp Blummer, B. A. (2007). A literature review of academic library Web page studies. Journal of Web Librarianship, 1(1), 45–64. Brandt, D. S. (1997). Tutorial or not tutorial, that is the question . . . Computers in Libraries, 17(5), 44–46. Bunkell, J., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2009). E-books vs. print: Which is the better value? Serials Librarian, 56, 215–219. Business Week. (2008a). Best undergrad B-schools (top 100). Business Week Online. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/rankings Business Week. (2008b). Business school rankings and profiles: Full-time MBA. Business Week Online. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/ rankings Carlock, D. M. (2008). Exploring faculty experiences with e-books: A focus group. Library Hi Tech, 26(2), 244–254. Coffta, M., & Schoen, D. M. (2000). Academic library web sites as a source of interlibrary loan lending information: A survey of four- and five-year colleges and universities. Library Resources and Technical Services, 44, 196–200. Courtois, M. P., Higgins, M. E., & Kapur, A. (2005). Was this guide helpful? User perceptions of subject guides. Reference Services Review, 33, 188–196. Crawford, J. (2008). Key issue: Securing access to print: The UKRR. Serials, 21, 232–234. De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Cellentani, D., Hawke, J., Jenkins, L., & Wilson, A. (2005). College students’ perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC membership. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center.

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

18

J. C. Gottfried

Detlor, B., & Lewis, V. (2006). Academic library web sites: Current practice and future directions. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32, 251–258. Dinkelman, A., & Stacy-Bates, K. (2007). Accessing e-books through academic library web sites. College & Research Libraries, 68, 45–58. Fitzpatrick, E. B., Moore, A. C., & Lang B. W. (2008). Reference librarians at the reference desk in a learning commons: A mixed methods evaluation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34, 231–238. Fortini, T. (2007). Going online: Academic libraries and the move from print to electronic journals. Library Student Journal, 2(6), 3–11. Frank, P. F. (2007). Assessing undergraduate interlibrary loan use. Journal of Interlibrary Loan Use, 18(1), 33–48. Genoni, P., Merrick, H., & Willson, M. A. (2006). Scholarly communities, e-research literacy and the academic librarian. The Electronic Library, 24, 734–746. Golderman, G. M., & Connolly, B. (2005). Briefcases and databases: Web-based reference sources for business librarians and their client communities. Reference Librarian, 44, 235–261. Granfield, D., & Robertson, M. (2008). Preference for reference: New options and choices for academic users. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 48, 44– 53. Gregory, C. L. (2008). “But I want a real book”: An investigation of undergraduates’ usage and attitudes toward electronic books. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47, 266–273. Hahn, E. (2009). E-statement studies: A reliable database for financial benchmarks. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14, 87–89. Hryjac, P. L. (2005). Elements of active learning in the online tutorials of ARL members. Reference Services Review, 33, 210–218. Hutton, J. (2008). Academic libraries as digital gateways: Linking students to the burgeoning wealth of open online collections. Journal of Library Administration, 48, 495–507. Kirkwood, H. P. (2000). Business library web sites: A review of the organization and structure of print, networked, and Internet resources. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 5(4), 23–40. Kyrillidou, M., & Bland, L. (Eds.). (2008). ARL statistics 2006–2007. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/stats/ annualsurveys/arlstats/arlstats07.shtml Levine-Clark, M. (2007). Electronic books and the humanities: A survey at the University of Denver. Collection Building, 26, 7–14. Lindsay, E. B., Cummings, L., & Johnson, C. M. (2006). If you build it, will they learn? Assessing online information literacy tutorials. College & Research Libraries, 67, 429–445. Littlejohn, A. C., & Talley, L. B. (1990). Business students and the academic library: A second look. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 1(1), 65–88. Lyons, C., & Kirkwood, H. (2009). Business library web sites revisited: An updated review of the organization and content of academic business library web sites. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14, 333–347. O’Hara, L. H. (2007a). Providing access to e-journals: An annotated bibliography. The Serials Librarian, 51, 129–155.

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

19

O’Hara, L. H. (2007b). Providing access to electronic journals in academic libraries: A general survey. The Serials Librarian, 51, 119–128. Oulanov, A. (2008). Business administration students’ perception of usability of the Business Source Premier database. Electronic Library 26, 505–519. Primary Research Group. (2008). Survey of academic libraries, 2008–09 edition. New York, NY: Author. Princeton Review. (2008). Princeton Review: Find a College. Retrieved from http://www.princetonreview.com Senior, H., Wu, K., Martin, D. M., & Mellinger, M. (2009). Three times a study: Business students and the library. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14, 202–229. Settimi, C., & Badenhausen, K. (2007). Best business schools. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/95/lead-careers-cz 07mba Best-Business -Schools Rank.html Srivastava, S. (2008, September 30). Executive M.B.A. rankings (a special report). Wall Street Journal, p. R.1. Tchangalova, N., & Feigley, A. (2008). Subject guides: Putting a new spin on an old concept. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3). Retrieved from http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/ v09n03/tchangalova n01.html Ugaz, A. G. (2008). Assessing print and electronic use of reference/core medical textbooks. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 96, 145–147. University of Florida Libraries. (2008). Business library 2.0. Retrieved from http://businesslibrary.uflib.ufl.edu University of Texas at Dallas. (2009). McDermott libraries. Retrieved from http://www.utdallas.edu/library/. U.S. News & World Report. (2008). America’s best graduate schools 2008: Best business schools. U.S. News and World Report Online. Retrieved from http://gradschools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/grad/mba/search Wales, T. (2005). Captivating Open University students with online literature search tutorials created using screen capture software. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems, 39, 112–121. Wales, T. (2008). Library subject guides: A content management case study at the Open University, UK. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems, 42, 365–381. Walton, E. W. (2007). From the ACRL 13th National Conference: E-book use versus users’ perspective. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 14, 19–35. Watkins, L. (2009). Westlaw business: LIVEDGAR + more. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14(2), 196–199.

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

20

J. C. Gottfried

APPENDIX A Schools Included in Study (Listed Alphabetically)
College or University American University Arizona State University Babson College Baylor University Belmont University Bentley College Binghamton University Boston College Boston University Brandeis University Brigham Young University Bryant College Buffalo University Carnegie Mellon University Case Western Reserve University Clemson University College of New Jersey College of William & Mary Colorado State University Columbia University Cornell University Dartmouth College Drexel University Duke University Emory University Florida State University Fordham University George Washington University Georgetown University Georgia Institute of Technology Harvard University Howard University Hult International Business School Illinois State University Iowa State University Indiana University James Madison University Lehigh University Loyola College Loyola University Louisiana State University Marquette University Mass. Institute of Technology Miami University Michigan State University New York University North Carolina State Northern Illinois University Northeastern University Business School Kogod School of Business W. P. Carey School of Business F. W. Olin Graduate School of Business Hamkamer School of Business College of Business Admin McCallum Graduate School of Business BU School of Management Carroll School of Management Boston University School of Mgmt Brandeis International Business School Marriott School of Management BC College of Business BU School of Management Tepper School of Business Weatherhead School of Management CU College of Business College of NJ School of Business Mason School of Business CSU College of Business Columbia Business School S.C. Johnson Graduate School of Mgmt Tuck School of Business LeBow College of Business Fuqua School of Business Goizueta Business School FSU College of Business Fordham Graduate School of Business George Washington School of Business McDonough School of Business GIT College of Mgmt Harvard Business School Howard Univ. School of Business Hult International Business School ISU College of Business ISU College of Business Kelley School of Business JMU College of Business College of Business and Economics Sellinger School of Bus & Mgmt LU School of Business E.J. Ourso College of Business College of Business Admin Sloan School of Management Farmer School of Business Eli Broad College of Business Stern School of Business Jenkins Grad School of Management NIU College of Business NEU Graduate School of Business

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Business Resources Through Academic Websites College or University Northwestern University Ohio State University Penn State University Pepperdine University Purdue University Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute Rochester Institute of Technology Rice University Rollins College Rutgers University Santa Clara University Seton Hall University Southern Methodist University Stanford University Temple University Texas A&M University Texas Christian University Thunderbird School of Global Mgmt Tulane University University at Buffalo (SUNY) University of Alabama University of Arizona University of Arkansas University of California, Berkeley University of California, Davis University of California, Irvine University of California, Los Angeles University of Chicago University of Colorado, Boulder University of Connecticut University of Delaware University of Denver University of Florida University of Georgia University of Houston University of Illinois University of Iowa University of Kentucky University of Louisville University of MD, College Park University of MA, Amherst University of Miami University of Michigan University of MN, Twin Cities University of Missouri University of NC, Chapel Hill University of Notre Dame University of Oregon University of Pennsylvania University of Pittsburgh Business School

21

Kellogg School of Management Fisher College of Business Smeal College of Business Graziadio School of Business and Mgmt Krannert School of Management Lally School of Mgmt & Technology Saunders College of Business Jones Graduate School of Management Crummer Graduate School of Business Rutgers Business School Leavey School of Business Stillman School of Business Cox School of Business Stanford Graduate School of Business Fox School of Business Mays Business School Neeley School of Business Garvin School of Intl Management A.B. Freeman School of Business UB School of Management Culverhouse Col. of Comm. & Bus. Adm Eller College of Management Walton College of Business Haas School of Business UC Davis Graduate School of Mgmt Merage School of Business UCLA Anderson School of Management Univ of Chicago Grad School of Business Leeds School of Business UC School of Business Lerner College of Business & Econ Daniels College of Business Warrington College of Business Terry College of Business Bauer College of Business UIUC College of Business Tippie College of Business Gatton College of Business & Econ UL College of Business Robert H. Smith School of Business Isenberg School of Management UM School of Business Admin Ross School of Business Carlson School of Management Trulaske College of Business Kenan-Flagler Business School Mendoza College of Business Lundquist College of Business Wharton School Katz School of Business (Continued on next page)

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

22 College or University University of Richmond University of Rochester University of San Diego University of South Carolina University of Southern California University of Tennessee University of Texas, Austin University of Texas, Dallas University of Utah University of Virginia University of Washington University of Wisconsin, Madison Vanderbilt University Villanova University Wake Forest University Washington University Yale University

J. C. Gottfried Business School Robins School of Business Simon School of Business USD School of Business Admin Moore School of Business Marshall School of Business UT College of Business Admin McCombs School of Business UT Dallas School of Management Eccles School of Business Darden Grad School of Bus Admin Foster School of Business UW School of Business Owen Grad School of Management Villanova School of Business Babcock Grad School of Management Olin School of Business Yale School of Management

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

APPENDIX B Protocol for Business Website Survey
School Access to Business Information from Library Website • Is there a separate Business Library, and/or Business Library Web Page? Yes No (If so, go there to do the survey—if not, use the regular library)0 • If there is a separate Business Library Web page, describe how you find and access it from the Library Home page? • Briefly describe the Business Web page (major classification/links from the page, design, etc.) Library Catalog/Books • Can you search by subject (Business, marketing, finance, etc.)? Yes No ◦ If so, was there an explanation of how to do this? Yes No ◦ Is there a Catalog tutorial or help function? Yes No • Is there an obvious way to search for electronic business books by topic? Yes No • Can you find periodical availability through the Library catalog? Yes No ◦ Formats? (i.e., microform, paper, electronic, aggregators, others ) Date

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

23

• Can you search for articles through the Library Catalog pages? Yes No • Can you link or connect to article databases through the catalog? Yes No • Are there suggested readings or a reading list for business students? Yes No Instruction/Subject Guides/Tutorials • Are Subject Guides available? Yes No ◦ What is the format (HTML, pdf, Word, Flash, others: ◦ Where are Subject Guides the website?
Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

located

)? on

◦ What are they called on the website? ◦ Subtopics? Yes No How many? ◦ Describe content briefly:

• Are tutorials (instructions on how to use a specific database or resource) available? Yes No ◦ How do you find them? ◦ Are there separate tutorials or instruction available on business research? If so, how many? Describe content briefly: ◦ Format: HTML, pdf, Word, Flash, other: )? ) ◦ Included on the Subject Guide? Or separately? (Describe ◦ Is online instruction provided for different types of users? (Circle all that apply) Students Faculty Staff Visitors Disabilities Undergraduate Graduate Faculty Business Librarian/Business Specialist • Does one exist? Yes No If so, how many? • Librarian(s) identified by name? Yes No ◦ How did you find this information? ◦ What term is used to identify the librarian? • Is there contact information for the Business Librarian(s)? Yes No ) ◦ What kinds? (Link to e-mail, phone, office, IM, other: • Business Librarian(s) personalized in some way? (photo, bio, web page, ) website, other:

24

J. C. Gottfried

Articles/Article Indexes Company Directories/Business Databases: • How do you access articles and databases? (Describe) ◦ Is there a direct link on the library home page? Yes No ◦ Is the path to research databases either explained, or obvious? Yes • Is there a Federated search? Yes No Vendor or platform? • How do you find the Business Databases? No

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

◦ Are they identified or listed as Business databases? Yes No ◦ Identified by topic? Yes No How? ◦ How many are there (from following checklist)? ◦ How many vendors of Electronic Books? ◦ Note any anomalies • Are the databases annotated or described in any way? Yes No • Is database instruction or help available from the database list area? Yes No

Databases # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Y/N Research Database ABI/Inform (ProQuest) Academic OneFile (Gale) Academic Search (EBSCO) Access World News (NewsBank) Accounting & Tax (ProQuest) Ad$Spender AICPA Accounting & Auditing Literature Amadeus (Bureau Van Dijk) American Accounting Association American Firms in Foreign Countries Asian Business Asian Wall Street Journal Associations Unlimited (Gale) Auction Block Audit Analytics Bal of Payments Statistics (IMF) Bank Scope Bankruptcy Insider (deal.com) Bankruptcy Law 360 Barron’s Best’s Insurance Reports Blackwell Reference Online Bloomberg BNA Tax Management Portfolios BNA BoardEx

Business Resources Through Academic Websites Databases # 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Y/N Research Database

25

Business & Co. Resource Ctr (Gale) Business & Industry Database (Gale) Business Insights Business Monitor Online Business NewsBank Business Periodicals Index Business Plans Handbooks Business Source (EBSCO) Cabell’s Directory Capital IQ (S & P) CCH Accounting Research Manager CCH Tax Research Network CCH China Data Online Choices (Simmons) ClimateWire Compact Disclosure Compustat (S & P) Conference Board Corporate Affiliations (LexisNexis) Corporate ResourceNet (EBSCO) CorpTech CountryData (PRS Group) Country Watch CQ Researcher (CQ Press) Credo Reference CRSP CSMAR (Chinese financial data) Current Index to Statistics Datastream (Thomson) Deal Pipeline DemographicsNow Digital Dissertations (ProQuest) Direction of Trade Statistics (IMF) Dissertation Abstracts EconLibrary.com EconLit Economagic Economatica Economia y Negocias Economist Intel. Unit eMarketer Emerald Encyclopedia of Associations Entrepreneurship Research Portal Europa World Execucomp Expanded Academic ASAP (Gale) Factiva FAITS (Faulkner Adv for Info Tech St.) First Call Historical Database (Continued on next page)

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

26

J. C. Gottfried Databases

# 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129

Y/N

Research Database First Research First Search (OCLC) Food Institute Foreign Firms Oper in U.S. Forrester Research Foundation Directory Frost & Sullivan Galante’s Venture Cap Pri. Equity Dir. Gale Gartner Online Info. Resources General Business File ASAP (Gale) Global Development Fin (GDF Online) Global Financial Data Global Insight Global Mkt Info Database (GMID) Google Scholar GuideStar Health Business Full Text (EBSCO) Hein Online Hispanic Business 500 Directory Historial Annual Reports (ProQuest) Hoover’s (D&B) Hospitality & Tourism Comp (EBSCO) IAOR (Intl Abstracts in Oper Research) I/B/E/S (Thomson) IBIS World Icarus (D&B) IndiaStat Info Sci-Online (IGI Global) Informs PubsOnLine InfoTech Trends InfoTrac IngentaConnect (Ingenta) Inspec Inst. For Study of Security Mkts (ISSM) Institutional Investor Journals Institutional Investor.com Intl Directory of Company Histories International Financial Statistics (IMF) Investext Plus (Gale) ISI Emerging Markets (Compustat) ISIS (insurance companies) Islamic Finance Info. Service (IFIS) JSTOR Jupiter Research Key Business Ratios (D&B) Lehman Live LexisNexis Academic LexisNexis Statistical Making of the Modern World Mgmt and Organization Studies (SAGE) Market Indicators and Forecasts

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Business Resources Through Academic Websites Databases # 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 Y/N Research Database

27

MarketLine Business Information Center MarketResearch.com (academic) MasterFile Premier (EBSCO) Materials Business File (MBF) MediaMark Mergent MergerArbAlert (Deal.com) Mergers and Acquisitions Million Dollar Database (D&B) Mintel Reports Moody’s Default Risk Service Morningstar NBER Working Papers Nelson’s Dir of Investment Managers New York Times New York Times Historical Newsletters ASAP (Gale) OneSource OptionMetrics Ivy DB Orbis Osiris Oxford PACAP (Japan) PAIS Passport Reference and Markets Periodicals Archive Online Plunkett Research PolicyFile Political Risk Services Polling the Nation Online ProductScan Online ProQuest PsycARTICLES PsycINFO RDS Business Reference Suite (Gale) Readers’ Guide Retrospective Red Books Reference USA Regional Business News (EBSCO) Research Insight (Compustat) RGE Monitor RIA Checkpoint Risk Abstracts SAGE Science Direct (Elsevier) Scopus SDC Platinum (Thomson Reuters) Securities Mosaic Simply Map (Continued on next page)

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

28

J. C. Gottfried Databases

# 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213

Y/N

Research Database Small Business Resource Ctr (Gale) Soc. Science Research Network (SSRN) Sociological Abstracts (CSA) Socrates (social & environmental perf) SourceOECD Spectrum Stock Ownership Databases Sports Business Research Network Springer SRDS Standard & Poor’s Statistical Abstract of the U.S. STAT-USA TableBase (RDS) Thomas Thomson Value Line Investment Survey Vault Online Career Library VC Deal Voting Analytics Data Wall Street Journal Wall Street Journal Historical Ward’s Bus. Dir. (Pub. & Private Cos.) Web of Knowledge Web of Science Westlaw Campus Research Wilson World Competitiveness Online (IMD) World Dev Indicators Online (WDI) WorldCat WRDS (Wharton Research Data Service) Zephyr Electronic Book Vendors Books 24 × 7 Ebrary NetLibrary Safari Tech Books

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Business Resources Through Academic Websites

29

APPENDIX C Research Databases Most Frequently Included on Academic Library Lists of Business Research Databases (Frequency ≥ 4)
Research Database LexisNexis Acad Business Source (various) EconLit ABI/Inform (various) Mergent Online Hoover’s STAT-USA Factiva Standard & Poor’s (various) Reg Bus News Value Line LexisNexis Stat JSTOR Source OECD Bus & Co Resource Ctr Intl Fin Stats Wall Street Journal World Dev. Indicators OL Mintel Reports Reference USA Conference Board Glob Mkt Insight Db PsycINFO Academic Search (various) CCH Tax Research Network EIU (various) TableBase (RDS) Web of Science Investext Plus Sports Bus Res Network Gartner Online NBER Wrk Papers Thomson (various) Wharton Res Data Service Science Direct Morningstar ISI Emerging Mkts Emerald (various) IBISWorld RIA Checkpoint PAISvar Business & Industry MarketSearch Million Dollar Db General Bus File SRDS Faulkner Adv Thomas (various) Frequency 105 98 93 76 76 74 73 70 70 66 62 58 57 57 55 55 54 51 50 50 49 47 47 45 45 44 43 42 40 40 39 39 39 39 38 37 36 35 35 35 34 32 31 30 28 28 26 26 % 90.5 84.5 80.2 65.5 65.5 63.8 62.9 60.3 60.3 56.9 53.4 50.0 49.1 49.1 47.4 47.4 46.6 44.0 43.1 43.1 42.2 40.5 40.5 38.8 38.8 37.9 37.1 36.2 34.5 34.5 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 32.8 31.9 31.0 30.2 30.2 30.2 29.3 27.6 26.7 25.9 24.1 24.1 22.4 22.4 (Continued on next page)

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

30 Research Database CCH (various) Glob Dev Finance OL MarketLine PsycArticles Thomson Datastream Red Books Wilson (various) Accounting & Tax Associations Unlimited Bloomberg (various) Global Insight NYT Historical Gale (various) MediaMark Plunkett OL ProQuest (various) Compustat Corporate Affiliations Dissertations & Theses New York Times SDC Platinum WSJ Historical CCH Accounting Research Glob Financial Dev Google Scholar SSRN Mergent (var) Vault Career Business Insight China Data IngentaConnect Simmons Choices 3 Statistical Abstract of U.S. Forrester Research Oxford (various) Simply Map Ad$Spender eMarketer Historical Annual Rpt Key Bus Ratios OneSource BNA Tax Mgmt Portfolios Cabell’s Digital Dissertations Exp Academic ASAP Orbis Pol Risk Service Westlaw Campus Research Business Monitor Online CorpTech Frost & Sullivan IMF Dir of Trade Stats Research Insight Web of Knowledge

J. C. Gottfried Frequency 25 25 25 25 24 23 23 22 22 22 22 22 21 21 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 19 19 18 18 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 % 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 20.7 19.8 19.8 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 18.1 18.1 18.1 18.1 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 15.5 15.5 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 13.8 13.8 13.8 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Business Resources Through Academic Websites Research Database Academic OneFile Materials Bus File Risk Abstracts Sociological Abst First Research Access World News Bus & Mgmt Practices Country Watch Euromonitor Mkt Rpts Galante’s Hosp & Tour Comp RMA eStatements Socrates 10K Wizard CRSP Dissertation Abstracts Europa World GuideStar Hein Online IMF Bal of Payments Stats InfoTech Trends InfoTrac Springer (various) DOAJ Jupiter Research Sage (various) Zephyr Ad∗ Access Bank Scope Credo Reference Economia y Negocias Foundation Directory I/B/E/S Making Mod Wld Mint Global Polling the Nation ProductScan Scopus Wiley Interscience AICPA Literature Business Plans Handbook Corporate ResourceNet Economagic First Search Mgmt & Org Studies Osiris WorldCat Amadeus Dir Foreign Firms in U.S. Dir of U.S. Firms/Foreign EconLibrary Entrep Res Portal Frequency 12 12 12 12 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5

31 %

10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 (Continued on next page)

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

32 Research Database Execucomp Global Road Warrior Health Business FT Informs Kompass Market Insight PolicyFile RDS Bus Ref Ste RGE Monitor Small Bus Res Ctr American Factfinder Audit Analytics Capital IQ CQ Researcher Demographics Now IMD World Comp Online IndiaStat Inst Investor Journals Intl Dir of Co. Hist MasterFile Prem Readers Gd Retro Ward’s Bus Directory

J. C. Gottfried Frequency 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 % 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4

Downloaded by [UNSW Library] at 23:29 11 September 2011

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close