Choosing the Right
Learner: Benefits of a
Structured Interview
Melissa McNeil, MD, MPH
How Do You Pick a New Learner?
Medical students/residents/fellows are
selected based on a variety of criteria
Academic performance
Standardized tests
Grades
Research/publications
Evidence of leadership
Letters of recommendation
The interview
The Traditional Interview
The interviewer generally asks a serious of
questions about the candidate’s previous
experience and/or goals for the future
Generally open ended
Why do you want to be a physician?
Where do you see yourself in 5 or 10 years?
Identify strengths/weaknesses
Can often be anticipated and prepared for by
the candidate
The Perfect Interview
Would identify behavioral characteristics
deemed critical to the job at hand
Would satisfy the usual psychometric criteria
of any selection process
Standardization
Reliability
Validity
Fairness
Must discriminate fairly between applicants
Methodology must be acceptable to
applicants
The Interview
What are your goals in the interview?
What questions go you usually ask?
Do you get the information you need to meet
your goals?
The Ideal Interview
Generally not designed to evaluate academic
qualifications; grades and scores suffice
Rather, the perfect interview would help to
evaluate other domains
Integrity
Leadership
Empathy
Ability to work as a team
Work ethic
New Strategies
Increasingly the business world is moving to
structured interview techniques
Widespread belief that structured interviews
offer better insight and more consistency of
result; easier to compare candidates and
more reliable
Two strategies have gained popularity:
Situational Judgement Tests
Behavioral Based Interviewing (BBI)
Objectives for Today
Encourage you to think about what you are
really looking to evaluate in an interview and
whether or not your current strategies are
working
Review and contrast two popular structured
interview techniques
Outline basic constructs for developing
questions in each technique
Situational Judgement Tests
Type of psychological test which
presents the applicant with realistic,
hypothetical scenarios
Goal is to assess judgement required for
problem solving in typical work situations
Applicant asked what he/she would do in
specific situations
Generally multiple choice format
Goal is to ask questions that directly assess
relevant job related behaviors
Situational Judgement Tests
Unlikely that practice can improve
performance as answers are not always
arrived at logically
Can tap into a wide range of constructs from
problem solving and decisional skills to
interpersonal constructs
Item Characteristics
SJT items vary widely in format.
Like most forms of multiple choice items, they
have a stem and several responses.
Item stem: Everyone in your work group has
received a new computer except you. What
would you do?
Item responses are possible actions.
Example Question 1
This morning, you found a fax in your in-box
that seems to concern a colleague's home
business. She normally does not use the fax
for business purposes.
The most effective response to this situation
would be:
The least effective response to this situation
would be:
Answers:
a) Politely, tell your co-worker that you will inform the
b)
c)
d)
e)
manager the next time you catch her using office
resources for private business.
Report the incident to the manager.
Put the fax in the manager's mailbox without saying
anything to anyone.
Put the fax in your co-worker's mailbox without
saying anything to anyone.
Give the fax to your co-worker and remind her that
office equipment is not supposed to be used for
personal use.
Example Question 2
You and a co-worker are working on a complex project
that demands a great deal of effort from both of you.
Your co-worker is frequently absent as a result of
burnout and stress from his personal problems. You
do not know much about the circumstances, nor have
you known him for long. Your co-worker contributes
very little to the project, and, as a result, you are
putting in an excessive amount of overtime in order to
keep the project moving ahead. You feel that your
health may begin to suffer if you continue to work as
many hours.
The most effective response:
The least effective response:
Answers to Sample Question 2
a) Ask other co-workers to help you manage
b)
c)
d)
e)
your workload.
Raise the issue with your manager and
request additional help to ensure that the
project is completed on schedule.
Meet with your co-worker to request that he
does his share of the work.
Continue to put in overtime to keep the
project moving ahead.
Offer to help your co-worker deal with his
personal problems.
Are Such Questions Useful?
Depends on how the questions are written
Requires careful identification of what types
of judgment the examiner is looking for
Need organizational consensus on what is
the right answer
Biggest benefit is that once developed, the
tests are standardized and not subject to
interpretation
Overview of SJT Test
Development
Identify a job or job
Generate item
class for which a
responses
SJT is to be
Edit item responses
developed
Determine response
Write critical
instructions
incidents
Develop a scoring
Sort critical incidents
key
Turn selected critical
incidents into item
stems
Identifying Critical Incidents
Think about a time when someone did a
really good job.
Think about a time when someone could
have done something differently.
Think of a recent work challenge you faced
and how you handled it.
Think of something you did in the past that
you were proud of.
Turn Critical Incidents into Stems
Working from the critical incidents, write item
stems.
Consider asking the same question in
different ways or scenarios.
The same item does not need to be written
twice, but you need to decide how redundant
the items are permitted to be.
Components of Questions
Stem Length
Stem Complexity
Response Instructions
Evaluation of the responses
Stem Length
Some stems are very short (You find the fax
in your mailbox).
Other stems present very detailed
descriptions of situations (Your coworker is
under stress and is not carrying his end of the
load; you are now feeling burned out and
falling behind in the project)
Stem Complexity
Complexity: Stems vary in the complexity of
the situation presented.
Low complexity: One has difficulty with a new
assignment and needs instructions.
High complexity: One has multiple
supervisors who are not cooperating with
each other, and who are providing conflicting
instructions concerning which of your
assignments has highest priority.
Response Instructions
Variety of ways to instruct the applicants to
respond:
What would you most likely do?
What would you most likely do? What would
you least likely do?
Pick the best answer.
Pick the best answer and then pick the worst
answer.
Rate each response for effectiveness.
Rate each response on likelihood that you
would do the behavior.
Response Instructions
The various response instructions fall into two
categories:
Knowledge
Behavioral tendency
Generate Item Responses
Have subject matter experts with different
levels of experience/expertise write additional
responses for each stem.
Prompts for writing responses:
What would you do?
What is the best thing to do?
What is a bad response that you think many
people would do?
Response Instruments and Faking
Applicants may recognize that what they
would most likely do is not the most effective
response.
Some applicants may choose to misrepresent
their behavioral tendency.
Behavioral Interviewing
Designed to assess specific skills
Touted as being better at assessing how an
applicant will perform on the job
Commonly used in business sector
Much less commonly employed in the field of
medicine
Principle of the technique is that the best
predictor of future behavior is past behavior
Behavioral Interviewing
When asked yes/no, or hypothetical
questions, the applicant can tell the
interviewer what he/she wants to hear
Eg: If asked, “what would you do if the
deadline on a project was moved up”, answer
would be to put in extra time
Easy for the applicant to guess the “right
answer”
Difficult for the interviewer to assess what a
candidate would actually do
Behavioral Interviewing
Compare to: What have you done in the past
when you needed to meet a tight deadline?
Follow with probing questions:
How many hours did you put in?
Were you successful in completing the task?
How did you feel about having to put in
overtime?
How were you compensated?
Behavioral Interviewing
Applicant is asked a series of standardized
questions
Designed to get the applicant to respond to
how he/she handled specific situations in the
past
Candidate is expected to describe situations
from the past and his/her feelings and/or
observations about the situation
Allows the interviewer to assess proficiency in
one or more job related areas
Steps in the Process
First step in the process is the identification of
the skills that you are looking for
Which are the most important?
Which are the least critical?
Once the skills are identified, need to develop
questions that will ask about behaviors that
reflect the desired skills
Then need to analyze the answers
How do the answers reflect the needed skills?
Identification of Skills
Name five skills that you want in a future
physician (ie a medical student)
Rank them in order of importance
How does your ranking change if the
applicant wants to go into:
Internal Medicine?
Pediatrics?
Pathology?
Should the skill set be differentiated at this
level?
Sample Skills Analysis
Coping
Goal Setting
Tolerance of Ambiguity
Written Communication
Decisiveness
Commitment to Task
Spoken Communication
Interaction
Assertiveness
Perceptivity
Energizing
Organization and Planning
Policy and Procedure
Creativity
Alertness
Versatility
Analytical Problem Solving
Reading the System
Decision Making and
Team Building
Problem Solving
Leadership
Competencies
Another way to approach this issue is to
consider the six ACGME competencies
Medical knowledge
Patient care
Interpersonal Communication skills
Professionalism
Practice Based Learning
Systems Based Learning
Developing the Questions
Classically begin with opening statements
such as:
Tell me about a time when. . . .
Can you describe a situation where . . . .
Can be casually inserted into an interview OR
more formally asked
Generally followed up with more questions to
more specifically explore all aspects of the
situation
Typical Questions: Identify the Skill
Describe a difficult problem that you tried to solve;
how did you identify the problem? How did you go
about trying to solve it?
Describe a time when you tried to persuade someone
to do something that they were not inclined to do?
Describe a time you decided on your own that
something needed to be done; what do you do to get
it done?
Practice Interviews
Pair off in twos
Each pair should identify:
The applicant
The interviewer
Take 10 minutes and “conduct” the interview
Reflect on how the interview went
As the applicant, how did the interview feel?
As the interviewer, what kind of knowledge
about the “applicant” did you obtain?