Ericta vs. City Government of Quezon City

Published on September 2020 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 1 | Comments: 0 | Views: 49
of x
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

 

CITY GOVERNMENT OF QUEZON CITY and CITY COUNCIL OF QUEZON CITY, petitioners, vs. HON. U!GE VICENTE G. ERICT" as #d$e o% t&e Co#rt o% First   Instan'e o% Ri(a), Q#e(on Cit*, +ran'& VIII- HIML"Y"NG ILIINO, INC.,   respondents. 1983-06-24 | G.R. No. L-34915 !ECI/ION GUTIERREZ, R., .0 This is a petition for review whih see!s the reversa" of the #eision of the $o%rt of &irst 'nstane of Ri(a") *ranh +,''' #e"arin etion 9 of /r#inane No. 6118) 6118) -64) of the %e(on $it $o%ni" n%"" an# voi#. etion 9 of /r#inane No. 6118) -64) entit"e# /R'NN$ RGLT'NG T7 T*L'7NT) 'NTNN$ N /RT'/N /& R',T /R'L T: $TR: /R *R'L GR/N ;'T7'N T7 <R''$T'/N /& =/N $'T: N R/,''NG NLT' &/R T7 ,'/LT'/N T7R/& provi#es> e. 9. t "east si? @6A perent of the tota" area of the BeBoria" par! eBeter sha"" Ce set asi#e for  harit C%ria" of #eease# persons who are pa%pers an# have Ceen resi#ents of %e(on $it for at "east 5 ears prior to their #eath) to Ce #eterBine# C oBpetent $it %thorities. The area so #esinate# sha"" iBBe#iate" Ce #eve"ope# an# sho%"# Ce open for operation not "ater than si? Bonths froB the #ate of approva" of the app"iation. app"iation. &or severa" ears) the aforeD%ote# setion of the /r#inane was not enfore# C it a%thorities C%t seven ears after the enatBent of the or#inane) the %e(on $it $o%ni" passe# the fo""owin reso"%tion> R/L, C the o%ni" of %e(on asseBC"e#) to reD%est) as it #oes hereC reD%est the $it nineer) %e(on $it) to stop an f%rther se""in an#Eor transation of BeBoria" par! "ots in %e(on $it where the owners thereof have fai"e# f ai"e# to #onate the reD%ire# 6F spae inten#e# for pa%pers C%ria". %rs%ant to this petition) the %e(on $it nineer notifie# respon#ent 7iB"aan 7iB"aan  i"ipino) 'n. in writin that etion 9 of /r#inane No. 6118) -64 wo%"# Ce enfore#. Respon#ent 7iB"aan i"ipino reate# C fi"in with the $o%rt of &irst 'nstane of Ri(a") *ranh +,''' at %e(on $it) a petition for #e"arator re"ief) prohiCition an# Ban#aB%s with pre"iBinar in%ntion @p. ro. No. -16002A see!in to ann%" etion 9 of the /r#inane in D%estion. The respon#ent a""ee# that the saBe is ontrar to the $onstit%tion) the %e(on $it $harter) the Loa" %tonoB t) an# the Revise# #Binistrative $o#e. There Cein no iss%e of fat an# the D%estions raise# Cein p%re" "ea") Coth petitioners an# respon#ent aree# to the ren#ition of a %#Bent on the p"ea#ins. The respon#ent o%rt) therefore) ren#ere# the #eision #e"arin etion 9 of /r#inane No. 6118) -64 n%"" an# voi#.   Botion for reonsi#eration reonsi#eration havin Ceen #enie#) the $it GovernBent an# $it $o%ni" fi"e# the instant petition. etitioners ar%e that the ta!in of the respon#entHs propert is a va"i# an# reasonaC"e e?erise e?erise of po"ie

 

power an# that the "an# is ta!en for a p%C"i %se as it is inten#e# for the C%ria" ro%n# of pa%pers. The f%rther ar%e that the %e(on $it $o%ni" is a%thori(e# %n#er its harter) in the e?erise of "oa" po"ie power) to Ba!e s%h f%rther or#inanes an# reso"%tions not rep%nant to "aw as Ba Ce neessar to arr into effet an# #ishare the powers an# #%ties onferre# C this t an# s%h as it sha"" #eeB neessar an# proper to provi#e for the hea"th an# safet) proBote the prosperit) iBprove the Bora"s) peae) oo# or#er) oBfort an# onveniene of the it an# the inhaCitants thereof) an# for the protetion of propert therein. t herein. /n the other han#) respon#ent 7iB"aan i"ipino) 'n. onten#s that the ta!in or onfisation of  propert is oCvio%s Cea%se the D%estione# or#inane perBanent" restrits the %se of the propert s%h that it annot Ce %se# for an reasonaC"e p%rpose an# #eprives the owner of a"" Cenefiia" %se of his propert. The respon#ent a"so stresses that the enera" we"fare "a%se is not avai"aC"e as a so%re of power for  the ta!in of the propert in this ase Cea%se it refers to the power of proBotin the p%C"i we"fare C restrainin an# re%"atin the %se of "iCert an# propert. The respon#ent points o%t that if an owner is #eprive# of his propert o%triht %n#er the tateHs po"ie power) the propert is enera"" not ta!en for  p%C"i %se C%t is %rent" an# s%BBari" #estroe# in or#er to proBote the enera" we"fare. The respon#ent ites the ase of a n%isane per se or the #estr%tion of a ho%se to prevent the sprea# of a onf"aration. ;e fin# the stan# of the private respon#ent as we"" as the #eision of the respon#ent <%#e to Ce we""-fo%n#e#. ;e D%ote with approva" the "ower o%rtHs r%"in whih #e"are# n%"" an# voi# etion 9 of  the D%estione# it or#inane> The iss%e is> 's etion 9 of the or#inane in D%estion a va"i# e?erise of the po"ie powerI n e?aBination of the $harter of %e(on $it @Rep. t No. 53J1A) #oes not revea" an provision that wo%"# %stif the or#inane in D%estion e?ept the provision rantin po"ie power to the $it. etion 9 annot Ce %stifie# %n#er the power rante# to %e(on $it to ta?) fi? the "iense fee) an# re%"ate s%h other C%siness) tra#es) an# o%pation as Ba Ce estaC"ishe# or pratie# in the $it.H $it.H @%C-setions H$H) e. 12) R.. 53JA. The power to re%"ate #oes not in"%#e the power to prohiCit @eop"e vs. s%erra) 81 hi". 33) ,ea vs. %niipa" *oar# of '"oi"o) L-6J65) a 12) 1954K 39 N.<. Law) J0) ih. 396A.  fortiori) the power to re%"ate #oes not in"%#e the power to onfisate. The or#inane in D%estion not on" onfisates C%t a"so prohiCits the operation of a BeBoria" par! eBeter) Cea%se %n#er etion 13 of sai# or#inane) H,io"ation of the provision thereof is p%nishaC"e with a fine an#Eor iBprisonBent an# that %pon onvition thereof the perBit to operate an# Baintain a private eBeter sha"" Ce revo!e# or ane""e#.H The onfisator "a%se an# the pena" provision in effet #eter one froB operatin a BeBoria" par! eBeter. eBeter. Neither an the or#inane in D%estion Ce %stifie# %n#er s%C-setion HtH) etion 12 of Rep%C"i t 53J whih a%thori(es the $it $o%ni" to HprohiCit the C%ria" of the #ea# within the enter of pop%"ation of the it an# provi#e for their C%ria" in s%h proper p"ae an# in s%h Banner as the o%ni" Ba #eterBine) s%Cet to the provisions of the enera" "aw re%"atin C%ria" ro%n#s an# eBeteries an# overnin f%nera"s an# #isposa" of the #ea#.H@%C-se.. @tA) e. 12) Rep. t No. 53JA. #ea#.H@%C-se There is nothin in the aCove provision whih a%thori(es onfisation or as e%pheBistia"" terBe# C the respon#ents) H#onation.H

 

;e now oBe to the D%estion whether or not etion 9 of the or#inane in D%estion is a va"i# e?erise of  po"ie power. The po"ie power of %e(on $it is #efine# in s%C-setion 00) e. 12) Rep. t 53J whih rea#s as fo""ows> @00A To Ba!e s%h f%rther or#inane an# re%"ations not rep%nant to "aw as Ba Ce neessar to arr into effet an# #ishare the powers an# #%ties onferre# C this at an# s%h as it sha"" #eeB neessar an# proper to provi#e for the hea"th an# safet) proBote) the prosperit) iBprove the Bora"s) peae) oo# or#er) oBfort an# onveniene of the it an# the inhaCitants thereof) an# for the protetion of propert thereinK an# enfore oCe#iene thereto with s%h "awf%" fines or pena"ties as the $it $o%ni" Ba presriCe %n#er the provisions of s%Csetion @A of this setion.H ;e start the #is%ssion with a restateBent of ertain Casi prinip"es. /%pin the forefront in the Ci"" of rihts is the provision whih states that Hno person sha"" Ce #eprive# of "ife) "iCert or propert witho%t #%e proess of "awH @rt. ''') etion 1 s%Cpararaph 1) $onstit%tionA. /n the other han#) there t here are three inherent powers of overnBent C whih the state interferes with tthe he propert rihts) naBe" @1A po"ie power) @2A eBinent #oBain) @3A ta?ation. These are sai# to e?ist in#epen#ent" in#epen#en t" of the $onstit%tion as neessar attriC%tes of sovereint. o"ie power is #efine# C &re%n# as Hthe power of proBotin the p%C"i we"fare C restrainin an# re%"atin the %se of "iCert an# propertH @%ote# in o"itia" Law C Taa#a an# $arreon) ,-'') p. 50A. 't is %s%a"" e?erte# in or#er to Bere" re%"ate the %se an# enoBent of propert of the owner. 'f he is #eprive# of his propert o%triht) it is not ta!en for p%C"i %se C%t rather to #estro in or#er to proBote the enera" we"fare. 'n po"ie power) the owner #oes not reover froB the overnBent for in%r s%staine# in onseD%ene thereof. @12 $.<. 623A. 't has Ceen sai# that po"ie power is the Bost essentia" of  overnBent powers) at tiBes the Bost insistent) an# a"was one of the "east "iBitaC"e of the powers of  overnBent @R%C vs. rovinia" *oar#) 39 hi". 660K 'hon vs. 7ernan#e() L-J995) a 31) 195JA. This power eBCraes the who"e ssteB of p%C"i re%"ation @.. vs. Lins%a &an) 10 hi". 104A. The %preBe $o%rt has sai# that po"ie power is so far-reahin in sope that it has a"Bost CeoBe iBpossiC"e to "iBit its sweep. s it #erives its e?istene froB the ver e?istene of the state itse"f) it #oes not nee# to Ce e?presse# or #efine# in its sope. *ein oe?tensive with se"f-preservation an# s%rviva" itse"f) it is the Bost positive an# ative of a"" overnBenta" proesses) the Bost essentia") insistent an# i""iBitaC"e. speia"" it is so %n#er the Bo#ern #eBorati fraBewo fraBewor! r! where the #eBan#s of soiet an# nations have B%"tip"ie# to a"Bost %niBainaC"e proportions. The fie"# an# sope of po"ie power have CeoBe a"Bost Co%n#"ess) %st as the fie"#s of p%C"i interest an# p%C"i we"fare have CeoBe a"Bost a"" eBCrain an# have transen#e# h%Ban foresiht. ine the $o%rts annot foresee the nee#s an# #eBan#s of p%C"i interest an# we"fare) the annot #e"iBit Ceforehan# the e?tent or sope of the po"ie power C whih an# thro%h whih the state see!s to attain or ahieve p%C"i interest an# we"fare. @'hon vs. 7ernan#e() L-J995) a 31) 195JA. The po"ie power Cein the Bost ative power of the overnBent an# the #%e proess "a%se Cein the Croa#est "iBitation on overnBenta" power) the onf"it Cetween this power of overnBent an# the #%e proess "a%se of the $onstit%tion is oftentiBes inevitaC"e. inevitaC"e. 't wi"" Ce seen froB the foreoin a%thorities that po"ie power is %s%a"" e?erise# in the forB of Bere re%"ation or restrition in the %se of "iCert or propert for the proBotion of the enera" we"fare. 't #oes not invo"ve the ta!in or onfisation of propert with the e?eption of a few ases where there is a neessit to onfisate private propert in or#er to #estro it for the p%rpose of protetin the peae an# or#er an# of proBotin the enera" we"fare as for instane) the onfisation of an i""ea"" possesse# arti"e) s%h as opi%B an# firearBs.

 

't seeBs to the o%rt that etion 9 of /r#inane No. 6118 6118)) eries of 1964 of %e(on $it is not a Bere po"ie re%"ation C%t an o%triht onfisation. 't #eprives a person of his private propert witho%t #%e proess of "aw) na) even witho%t oBpensation. 'n s%stainin the #eision of the respon#ent o%rt) we are not %nBin#f%" of the heav C%r#en sho%"#ere# C whoever ha""enes the va"i#it of #%" enate# "eis"ation) whether nationa" or "oa". s ear" as 1913) this $o%rt r%"e# in $ase v. *oar# of 7ea"th @24 hi". 250A that the o%rts reso"ve ever pres%Bption in favor of va"i#it an#) Bore 90) where the B%niipa" orpora orporation tion asserts that the t he or#inane was enate# to proBote the oBBon oo# an# enera" we"fare. 'n the "ea#in ase of rBita-a"ate 7ote" an# ote" /perators ssoiation 'n. v. $it aor of ani"a @20 $R 849A the $o%rt spea!in thro%h the then ssoiate <%stie an# now $hief <%stie nriD%e . &ernan#o state#> riBari" what a""s for a reversa" of s%h a #eision is the aCsene of an evi#ene to offset the pres%Bption of va"i#it that attahes to a ha""ene# stat%te or or#inane. s was e?presse# ateoria"" C <%stie a"o"B> HThe pres%Bption is a"" in favor of va"i#it. . . . The ation of the e"ete# representatives of the peop"e annot Ce "iht" set asi#e. The o%ni"ors B%st) in the ver nat%re of  thins) Ce faBi"iar with the neessities of their parti%"ar B%niipa"it an# with a"" the fats an# ir%Bstanes whih s%rro%n# the s%Cet an# neessitate ation. The "oa" "eis"ative Co#) C enatin the or#inane) has in effet iven notie that the re%"ations are essentia" to the we""-Cein of the peop"e. . . . The <%#iiar sho%"# not "iht" set asi#e "eis"ative ation when there is not a "ear invasion of  persona" or propert rihts %n#er the %ise of po"ie re%"ation.H @.. v. a"averia M1918) 39 hi". 102) at p. 111. There was an affirBation of the pres%Bption of va"i#it of B%niipa" or#inane as anno%ne# in the "ea#in a"averia #eision in Coa v. aet) M1950 85 hi". 369.A. ;e have "i!ewise onsi#ere# the prinip"es ear"ier state# in $ase v. *oar# of 7ea"th s%pra> . . . n#er the provisions of B%niipa" harters whih are !nown as the enera" we"fare "a%ses) a it) C virt%e of its po"ie power) Ba a#opt or#inanes to se%re the peae) safet) hea"th) Bora"s an# the Cest an# hihest interests of the B%niipa"it. 't is a we""-sett"e# prinip"e) rowin o%t of the nat%re of  we""-or#ere# an# ivi"i(e# soiet) that ever ho"#er of propert) however aCso"%te an# %nD%a"ifie# Ba Ce his tit"e) ho"#s it %n#er the iBp"ie# "iaCi"it that his %se of it sha"" not Ce in%rio%s to the eD%a" enoBent of others havin an eD%a" riht to the enoBent of their propert) nor in%rio%s to the rihts of  the oBB%nit. "" propert in the state is he"# s%Cet to its enera" re%"ations) whih are neessar to the oBBon oo# an# enera" we"fare. Rihts of propert) "i!e a"" other soia" an# onventiona" rihts) are s%Cet to s%h reasonaC"e "iBitations in their enoBent as sha"" prevent theB froB Cein in%rio%s) an# to s%h reasonaC"e restraints an# re%"ations) estaC"ishe# C "aw) as the "eis"at%re) %n#er the overnin an# ontro""in power veste# in theB C the onstit%tion) Ba thin! neessar an# e?pe#ient. The state) %n#er the po"ie power) is possesse# with p"enar power to #ea" with a"" Batters re"atin to the enera" hea"th) Bora"s) an# safet of the peop"e) so "on as it #oes not ontravene an positive inhiCitio inhiCition n of the orani "aw an# provi#in that s%h power is not e?erise# in s%h a Banner as to %stif the interferene of the o%rts to prevent positive wron an# oppression.

C%t fin# theB not app"iaC"e to the fats of this ase. There is no reasonaC"e re"ation Cetween the settin asi#e of at "east si? @6A perent of the tota" area of a"" private eBeteries for harit C%ria" ro%n#s of #eease# pa%pers an# the proBotion of hea"th) Bora"s) oo# or#er) safet) or the enera" we"fare of the peop"e. The or#inane is at%a"" a ta!in witho%t oBpensation of a ertain area froB a private eBeter to Cenefit pa%pers who are hares of the

 

B%niipa" orporation. 'nstea# of C%i"#in or Baintainin a p%C"i eBeter for this p%rpose) the it passes the C%r#en to private eBeteries. The e?propriation witho%t oBpensation of a portion of private eBeteries is not overe# C etion 12@tA of Rep%C"i t 53J) the Revise# $harter of %e(on $it whih eBpowers the it o%ni" to prohiCit the C%ria" of the #ea# within the enter of pop%"ation of the it an# to provi#e for their C%ria" in a proper  p"ae s%Cet to the provisions of enera" "aw re%"atin C%ria" ro%n#s an# eBeteries. ;hen the Loa" GovernBent $o#e) *atas aBCansa *". 33J provi#es in etion 1JJ @DA that a an%nian pan"%nso# Ba provi#e for the C%ria" of the #ea# in s%h p"ae an# in s%h Banner as presriCe# C "aw or or#inane it siBp" a%thori(es the it to provi#e its own it owne# "an# or to C% or e?propriate private properties to onstr%t p%C"i eBeteries. This has Ceen the "aw an# pratie in the past. 't ontin%es to the present. ?propriation) however) reD%ires paBent of %st oBpensation. The D%estione# or#inane or#inane is #ifferent froB "aws an# re%"ations reD%irin owners of s%C#ivisions to set asi#e ertain areas for streets) par!s) p"aro%n#s) an# other p%C"i fai"ities froB the "an# the se"" to C%ers of s%C#ivision "ots. The neessities of p%C"i safet) hea"th) an# onveniene are ver "ear froB sai# reD%ireBents whih are inten#e# to ins%re the #eve"opBent of oBB%nities with sa"%Crio%s an# who"esoBe environBents. environBents. The Cenefiiaries of the re%"ation) in t%rn) are Ba#e to pa C the s%C#ivision #eve"oper when in#ivi#%a" "ots are so"# to hoBeowners.  s a Batter of fat) the petitioners re" so"e" on the enera" we"fare "a%se or on iBp"ie# powers of the B%niipa" orporation) not on an e?press provision of "aw as stat%tor Casis of their e?erise of power. The "a%se has a"was reeive# Croa# an# "iCera" interpretation C%t we annot streth it to over this parti%"ar ta!in. oreover) the D%estione# or#inane was passe# after 7iB"aan i"ipino) 'n. ha# inorporate#)) reeive# neessar "ienses an# perBits) an# oBBene# operatin. The seD%estration of  inorporate# si? perent of the eBeter annot even Ce onsi#ere# as havin Ceen iBp"ie#" a!now"e#e# C the private respon#ent when it aepte# the perBits to oBBene operations. operations. 1HEREFORE ) the petition for review is hereC !I/MI//E! 1HEREFORE) !I/MI//E!.. The #eision of the respon#ent o%rt is affirBe#. /O OR!ERE!. OR!ERE!. Teehan!ee @$hairBanA) e"enio-7errera) "ana) ,asD%e( an# Re"ova) <<.) on%r.

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close