The Birth Certificate

THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE
from Gabrielle
When a child is born, the hospital sends the original, not a copy, of the
record of lie birth to the !tate B"rea" of #ital !tatistics, sometimes
called the $epartment of Health and Rehabilitatie !erices %HR!&'
Each !TATE is re("ired to s"pply the )*ITE$ !TATE! +ith birth,
death, and health statistics' The !TATE agency that receies the
original record of lie birth ,eeps it and then iss"es a Birth Certificate
in the corr"pted, A--.CA/! ersion of the baby0s tr"e name, i'e' JANE
DOE SMITH, not Jane Doe Smith'
The Birth Certificate iss"ed by the !tate is then registered +ith the
)'!' $epartment of Commerce . . the E1ec"tie 2ffice . specifically
thro"gh their o+n s"b.agency, the )'!' Cens"s B"rea", +hich is
responsible to register ital statistics from all the states' The +ord
registered 3 see note 4 belo+ 5, as it is "sed +ith commercial or legal
based e("ity la+, does not mean that the A-- . CA/! name +as
6merely6 noted in a boo, for reference p"rposes' When a birth
certificate is registered +ith the )'!' $epartment of Commerce, it
means that the A--.CA/! legal person named thereon has become a
surety, or g"arantor, a condition and obligation that is a"tomatically
and "n+ittingly ass"med "nless yo" reb"t the pres"mption by
effectiely noticing them7 6It ain0t me'6
6registered6 !ec"rity . bond .. 8erriam Webster $ictionary of -a+
499:'
!EE 8emorand"m of -a+ on the *ame by Gordon Warren Epperly
6G"arantor6 A person +ho pledges collateral for the contract of
another, b"t separately, as part of an independent contract +ith the
obligee of the original contract ... $"haime0s -a+ $ictionary'
It is not diffic"lt to see that a state - created birth certificate +ith
an A--.CA/! name is a doc"ment, eidencing debt the moment it is
iss"ed' 2nce a state has registered a birth doc"ment +ith )'!'
$epartment of Commerce, the $epartment notifies the Treas"ry
$epartment, +hich ta,es o"t a loan from the Federal Resere' The
Treas"ry "ses the loan to p"rchase a bond %the Fed holds a 6p"rchase
money sec"rity interest6 in the bond& from the $epartment of
Commerce, +hich inests the sale proceeds in the stoc, or bond
mar,et'
!o the child ;"st became the slae ''''' can yo" see ho+ this has
happened< )ntil yo" ta,e control, in other +ords 6reb"t6, yo" +ill
remain the slae' !laes do not hae freedoms'''''''''' and that is +hat
+e all %or almost all& hae been since the day +e +ere born, and o"r
innocent parents , and their parents, and their parents''''' before "s'
$on0t yo" thin, it is time that +e +o,e "p to the tr"th<
*ote 47
p"t register in the -22= )/' When the definition screen pops "p, p"t
registered in the second bo1'
!ee !tr"ct"re of the Birth Certificate
!ee 8emorand"m of -a+ on the *ame by Gordon Warren Epperly
!ee 8E82RA*$)8 2F -AW 2* *A8E by >ohn /hillip Ellis !r'
!ee I$E*TIT? THEFT by Clyde Ed+ard /o+ell
!ee ?2), Inc' . The Basis of the 8onetary Con Game
!ee Is a birth certificate in itself an instr"ment, a promissory note or
other negotiable instr"ment of commercial al"e< by Barton Albert
B"ht@
!ee I! THE )CC FI-I*G ?2)R RE8E$?<
!ee )'!' -egal History
Structure of the Birth ertificate
$id the !tate /ledge ?o"r Body to a Ban,<
By7 $aid $eschesne
Adanced Ciics Research -ibrary
Right7 !ome birth and marriage
certificates are no+ 6+areho"se
receipts,6 printed on ban,note
paper, +hich may mar, yo" and
yo"rs as 0chattel0 property of the
ban,s that o"r goernment borro+s
from eery day'
A certificate is a 6paper establishing
an o+nership claim'6 . Barron0s
$ictionary of Ban,ing Terms' Registration of births began in 494A, by
the B"rea" of Cens"s, +ith all states adopting the practice by 49BB'
Birth and marriage certificates are a form of sec"rities called
6+areho"se receipts'6 The items incl"ded on a +areho"se receipt, as
descried at CD.EFE of the )niform Commercial Code, the la+ +hich
goerns commercial paper and transactions, +hich parallel a birth or
marriage certificate are7
.the location of the +areho"se +here the goods are stored'''
%residence&
.the date of iss"e of the receipt'''''%6$ate iss"ed6&
.the consec"tie n"mber of the receipt'''%fo"nd on bac, or front of the
certificate, "s"ally in red n"mbers&
.a description of the goods or of the pac,ages containing them'''
%name, se1, date of birth, etc'&
.the signat"re of the +areho"seman, +hich may be made by his
a"thori@ed agent'''%m"nicipal cler, or state registrar0s signat"re&
BirthGmarriage certificates no+ appear to at least ("alify as
6+areho"se receipts6 "nder the )niform Commercial Code' Blac,0s -a+
$ictionary, D
th
ed' defines7
+areho"se receipt' 6'''A +areho"se receipt, +hich is considered a
doc"ment of title, may be a negotiable instr"ment and is often "sed
for financing +ith inentory as sec"rity'6
!ince the )'!' +ent ban,r"pt in 49BB, all ne+ money has to be
borro+ed into e1istence' All states started iss"ing serial.n"mbered,
certificated 6+areho"se receipts6 for births and marriages in order to
pledge "s as collateral against those loans and m"nicipal bonds ta,en
o"t +ith the Federal Resere0s ban,s' The 6F"ll faith and Credit6 of the
American people is said to be that +hich bac, the nation0s debt' That
simply means the American people0s ability to labor and pay bac, that
debt' In order to catalog its laborers, the goernment needed an
efficient, methodical system of trac,ing its property to that end'
H"mans today are loo,ed "pon merely as reso"rces . 6h"man
reso"rces,6 that is'
Goernmental assignment of a dollar al"e to the heads of citi@ens
began on >"ly 4H, 4I:E +hen /resident -incoln offered : percent
interest bearing.bonds to states +ho freed their slaes on a 6per head6
basis' This practice of al"ating h"mans %cattle<& contin"es today +ith
o"r c"rrent system of debt.based c"rrency reliant "pon a steady
stream of fresh ne+ chattels to bac, it'
!ee THE /ERI-! 2F *A#IGATI2*
Thursday, October 19, 106
THE PERILS OF NAVIGATION.
by
Antoni
o
Vacci
©94D.
WHEN DID YOUR VESSEL TOUH THE WATER!
"a ship is born when she is launched, and lives so long as her
identity is preserved......In baptism of launching she receives her
name, and from the moment her keel touches the water she is
transformed, and becomes a subject of admiralty Jurisdiction.
She acquires a personality of her own; becomes competent to
contract, and is individually liable for her obligations, upon which
she may sue in the name of her owner, and be sued in the name of
her owner.
er owners agents may not be her agents, and her agents may not
be her owners agents......She is capable, too, of committing a tort,
and is responsible in damages therefor.
She may also become a quasi bankrupt; may be sold for the
payment of her debts, and thereby receive a complete discharge
from all prior liens with liberty to begin a new life, contract further
obligations, and perhaps be subjected to a second sale." T#c$%& '.
A(%)an*%&o++ ,-. U.S. /04 1,92,3
So 4#c5 +o& t5% 6%7a&ation o+ c5#&c5 an* 6tat%8
AARRR MATE9 .... W%(co4% aboa&* t5% Unit%* Stat%6 citi:%n;S5i7. W5at<6
yo#& '%66%(6<9 t&an6+o&4%* in the state 9 ba7ti64a( na4%! n#4b%&!
Yo# 5a'% to =i'% it9 too9 it<6 t5% law. Yo# can b% a&&%6t%* i+ yo# *on<t
*i6c(o6% yo#& Vassal I* N#4b%& 1VIN3. Don<t co47(ain9 >%<&% a(( in t5%
6a4% boat. No> >5%&% a&% yo#& Pa7%&6!
R%4%4b%&9 shipmate9 "as a !member of the crew!, this term, is not
confined to those who can hand, reef, and steer, and everyone is
entitled to the privilege of a seamen who at all times contributes to
the labor about the operation and welfare of a ship when she is
upon her voyage." Ea&(y '. D&%*=in= o.9 D.. Pa.9 ,2, F. S#77. .9.9 .9?.
"seamans wages attach to appurtenances even though owned
separately". T5% E*>in Po6t9 ,, F. /20 1D. D%(. ,--03
"appurtenances was construed to mean that whatever belonged to
a shipowner that was on board his vessel for the objects of
navigation and the adventure in which she was engaged
constituted a part of the vessel and her....." Act o+ (i4it t5% R%67on6ibi(ity o+
S5i7 O>n%&6 in %&tain a6%6. ,-,.9 ?. G%o .9 c5. ,?99 @@9 A9 -9 ,99 ,..
So8 swabbie9 Ho> *o%6 it +%%( to b% an appurtenance o+ t5% 65i7 o+
6tat%!
W% $no> yo# a&% 6(i=5t(y #76%t abo#t +%%(in= shanghaied9 b#t9 yo# can
b% in6#&%* >it5 yo#;o#& surety ... ... ... =#a&ant%%* ... ... ... 5on%6t. On t5%
U.S. citi:%n;65i7 yo# a&% "invested with certain rights"
1FORTIETH ONGRESS. II H. 0499 0?2. ,-/-3 an* in ti4%9 t5&o#=5 6ocia(
%*#cation an* acB#i%6c%nc%9 yo#<(( +o&=%t a(( abo#t t5o6% i*%a(6 yo# ca((
Ri=5t6... ... ... Unalienable. Fo& a6 it i6 ca&'%* in t5% 6ton% %nt&anc% on
t5% >a(( o+ t5% ca7ito( %*i+ic% +o& t5% STATE OF OREGON9 in Sa(%49 A 4otto
C
"" free state is formed and is maintained by the voluntary union of
the whole people joined together under the same body of laws for
the common welfare and the sharing of benefits justly
apportioned".
S5a&in= >%(+a&%. Do%6n<t t5at a66#&% yo# o+ o#& benefice co4&a*%!
An* +o&=%t too abo#t +in*in= any +&%% 7%o7(% in t5% >5o(% Stat%. Daintain%*
#nion an* co44on >%(+a&% i6 t5% +#t#&%. Autonomy b&%%*6 c5ao6 an* o#&
*i6cont%nt 6o *on<t no> b% 6%(+i65 an* a6$ +o& any 4o&% t5an t5% ot5%&
beneficiaries. Ro(( #7 yo#& 6(%%'%6 an* cont&ib#t%.......'o(#nta&i(y o+
co#&6%. Don<t 4a$% >a'%6 an* &oc$ t5i6 S5i7 o+ "6tat%". W% *on<t >ant to
7#t a-lien-able on Yo#& "vessel #property interest$ !in rem! and
%ou, the owner !in personam! for torts committed" 1P%o7(%6 '. E%%&6 02
Ho>. .9.9 ,?/. E*. 9/,3 a=ain6t t5% *i=nity o+ t5% US "6tat%" Union S5o7
Acti'iti%6 1T5% USS USA39 a(t5o#=59 >% >i(( >it5 t5% 6(i=5t%6t 7&o'ocation.
W5i(% on t5% USS USA an* >5%n a6$%* to *%6c&ib% yo#& co(o&69 comrade
65a(( 7&oc(ai49 "&%*9 >5it% an* b(#%... ... ... >it5 =o(*". W5%n a6$%* to
*%6c&ib% it6 +o&49 t5% whole people joined together 65a(( 7&o#*(y
anno#nc%9 "6ta&6 an* 6t&i7%69 in'%&t%*9 t5% +i%(* >it5 an escutcheon9 an
%4b(a:on4%nt o+ t5% U.N. in6i=nia 5%(* c%nt%&9 a((9 t&i44%* in t5% =o(* o+
municipal justice equally apportioned9 an* 4o6t i47o&tant(y
o+ t5% O&*%&9 5%(* by a b%n%'o(%nt 4i(ita&y guarding the whole
people an* in6#&in= t5% maintenance o+ t5at voluntary UNion +o& a
+&%%"... ... ... A +&%% >5at! T5at<6 co&&%ct 4y 6ocia( 6%c#&% co44#n%;i6t
a66ociat% ... ... ... a free 6tat%9 not a +&%% 7%o7(%.
U.N.OFFIIAL an* U.N.;I;FORDING9 7&oc(ai4in= it6
U.N.ONSTITUTIONALITY. Ho> U.N.ADERIAN8
An* i+ yo# a&% %'%& a6$%* to >5at name yo# pledge yo#&6%(+
allegiance an* fealty9 y%t9 (%6t yo# +o&=%t a#tono4y b% a '%)ation o+
t5% i*(% 5an*9 co4&a*% shall an6>%& a6 i6 a(6o %n=&a'%* in t5% 4a&b(% o+
an o#t&i==%& a77#&t%nant t5% ca7ito( 6#7%&6t&#ct#&% o+ t5% S5i7 o+ t5%
STATE OF OREGONC
"westward &' S&"( )* '+,I(' takes its way" 1%475a6i6 a((
4yn%3
Sai(o&9 no> yo# $no> t5% 5%a*in= +&o4 t5i6 6ta& an* the perils of
navigation.
D#tiny a=ain6t t5i6 bounty. NOW AS NEVER EEFORE8 Fo& Yo#9 t5% I AD
in t5% AD%&ican Way a&% a(4o6t at t5% 7oint o+ no &%t#&n9 no &%und9 no
6a(%. An A4%&ica canc%(%*9 *#% to (ac$ o+ int%&%Ft. No Way 8
YES >ay9 to c#(;4i;nation ... ... ... an* YOU&6G o#&t%6y o+ a N%> Wo&(*
4ani+%6t;O;&*%&. Vi'a (a E47i&%8
PEOPLE... ... ... WAHE UP8 An* 64%(( t5% O(* S7ic%.
-earn the real definitions to all these words, phrases and their
utility.
YOU 4#6t HNOW8 T5% Hno>;(%*=% >i(( 6%t yo# +&%%. No> (%a79 Fait5+#((y9
to it. W5at i6 t5% limitation on !nalienable! W5at &%7#=nant
con*ition o& fredum b% La>+#((y #7on F&%%*o4! on6t&ain%* on(y by
on%6 con6%nt9 +o& "onsensus facit legem# "on6%nt 4a$%6 t5%
(a>". Acquiescence i6 a tacit con6%nt o& ot5%&>i6% an
abandonment. reedom *i* not aban*on #6G W% acti'%(y con6%nt%*
to b% ee$
ALIENATIO LIET PROHIEEATUR9 ONSENSU TADEN ODNIUD9 IN
IUORUD FAVORED PROHIEITA EST9 POTEST FIERI9 ET IUILIEET
POTEST RENUNIARE JURI PRO SE INTRODUTO. "lthough alienation
be prohibited, yet, by the consent of all in whose favor it is
prohibited, it may take place; for it is in the power of any man to
renounce a law made in his own favor. o. Litt. 9-
It i6 5o7%* YOU an* YOUR;SELF a&% %nco#&a=%* to F&%%*o4. To t5%
GoOD +i=5t.
Yo#& c5oic%!... ... ... A4%&ica t5% F&%% o& A4%&i$a t5% F%%.
H%a'%;to t5i6 S5i79 THE STAR OF EDPIRE. Wat%&>in=6 a&% not inc(#*%*.
To F%% o& not to F%%!
T5at i6 t5% B#%6tion9 >5%&%a6 it b% nob(%& to NOTG WE can no (on=%& &%6t on
O#& %A"&E'.
EPILOGUEC
R%B#i&% *i&%ction6 to t5% B#a6i ban$&#7t;6%a co#&t! Eig Dovement >i((
co47(%t%(y discharge t5% bi(=% o+ t5% citi:%n;65i7. OH8 W5at a
+%%(in=. ... ... ... >it5 %iberty an* Truth.
D%4o&an*#4 o+ La> on t5% Na4%
by Gordon Warren Epperly
Many people are involved in diligent research concerning the use of all capital
letters for proper names, e.g., JO! "#$% JO!&' as a substitute for John "aul Jones in
all court documents, driver(s licenses, ban) accounts, birth certificates, etc.. *s the use of
all capital letters to designate a name some special &nglish grammar rule or style+ *s it a
contemporary #merican style of &nglish+ *s the use of this form of capitali,ation
recogni,ed by educational authorities+ *s this an official -udicial or $.'. government rule
and.or style of grammar+ /hy do attorneys, court cler)s, prosecutors -udges, insurance
companies, ban)s, credit card companies, utility companies, etc. al0ays use all capital
letters 0hen 0riting a proper name+
W5at En=(i65 =&a44a& %)7%&t6 6ay
One of the foremost authorities on #merican &nglish grammar, style,
composition, and rules is The Chicago Manual of Style. The latest 112th3 &dition,
published by the $niversity of 4hicago "ress, is internationally )no0n and respected as a
ma-or contribution to maintaining and improving the standards of 0ritten or printed te5t.
'ince 0e can find no reference in their manual concerning the use of all capitali,ed
letters 0ith a proper name or any other usage, 0e 0rote to the editors and as)ed
this 6uestion7
8*s it acceptable, or is there any rule of &nglish grammar, to allo0 a proper name to be
0ritten in all capital letters+ 9or e5ample, if my name 0as John "aul Jones, can it be
0ritten as JO! "#$% JO!&'+ *s there any rule covering this+8
The &ditorial 'taff of the $niversity of 4hicago ans0ered7
8/riting names in all caps is not conventional: it is not 4hicago style to put anything in
all caps. 9or instance, even if (;O!& /*T T& /*!<( appears on the title page all in
caps, 0e 0ould properly render it (;one 0ith the /ind( in a bibliography. The only
reason 0e can thin) of to do so is if you are 6uoting some material 0here it is important
to the narrative to preserve the casing of the letters.
=/e(re not sure in 0hat conte5t you 0ould li)e your proper name to appear in all caps,
but it is li)ely to be seen as a bit odd.8
%a0 is e5tremely precise. &very letter, capitali,ation, punctuation mar), etc., in a
legal document is utili,ed for a specific reason and has legal 1i.e. deadly force3
conse6uences. *f, for instance, one attempts to file articles of incorporation in the office
of a 'ecretary of 'tate of a 'tate, if the e5act title of the corporation > do0n to every -ot
and tittle > is not e5actly the same each and every time the corporation is referenced in
the documents to be filed, the 'ecretary of 'tate 0ill refuse to file the papers. This is
because each time the name of the corporation is referenced it must be set forth
identically in order to e5press the same legal entity. The tiniest difference in the name of
the corporation identifies an entirely different legal person.
*t is therefore an eminently valid, and possibly crucial, 6uestion as to 0hy
governments, governmental courts, and agencies purporting to e5ist 1in some undefined,
unproved manner3 0ithin the -urisdiction of =this state? insist on al0ays capitali,ing
every letter in a proper name.
Mary !e0ton @ruder, "h.<., also )no0n as The Grammar Lady, 0ho established
the Grammar Hotline in the late 19A0(s for the 8Coalition of Adult Literacy,8 0as as)ed
the follo0ing 6uestion7
8/hy do federal and state government agencies and departments, -udicial and
administrative courts, insurance companies, etc., spell a person(s proper name in all
capital letters+ 9or e5ample, if my name is John "aul Jones, is it proper at any time to
0rite my name as JO! "#$% JO!&'+8
<r. @ruder(s reply 0as short and to the point7 8It must be some kind of
internal style. There is no grammar rule about it.8
*t seemed that these particular grammatical e5perts had no idea 0hy proper names
0ere 0ritten in all caps, so 0e began to assemble an e5tensive collection of reference
boo)s authored by various publishers, governments, and legal authorities to find
the ans0er.
What English grammar reference books say
Manual on Usage & Style
One of the reference boo)s obtained 0as the 8Manual on $sage B 'tyle,8
&ighth &dition, *'@! *CADA6D2CE1CF, published by the Te5as %a0 Gevie0 in 199E.
'ection <, CAPITALIATI!", paragraph <7 171 states7
8#l0ays capitali,e proper nouns... H"roper nounsI, independent of the conte5t in 0hich
they are used, refer to specific persons, places, or things 1e.g., <an, #ustin, Golls
Goyce3.8
"aragraph <7 J7K of 'ection < states7
84apitali,e "eople, 'tate, and any other terms used to refer to the government as a litigant
1e.g., the "eople(s case, the 'tate(s argument3, but do not capitali,e other 0ords used to
refer to litigants 1e.g., the plaintiff, defendant Manson3.8
&ither no attorney, -udge, or la0 cler) in Te5as has ever read the recogni,ed la0
style manual that purports to pertain to them, or the act is a deliberate violation of the
rules for undisclosed reasons. *n either ignorance 1=ignorance of the la# is no e$cuse?3
or violation 1one %iolating the la# he enforces on others is acting under title of nobility
and abrogating the &rinci&le of e'uality under the la#3 of la0, they continue to 0rite
8Plaintiff,? 8(efendant,8 8T& 'T#T& O9 T&F#'8 and proper names of parties in all
capital letters on every court document.
T5% E(%4%nt6 o+ Sty(%
#nother 0ellCrecogni,ed reference boo) is 8The )lements of Style,8
9ourth &dition, *'@! 0CK0ECJ090KCF, 0ritten by /illiam 'trun), Jr. and &.@. /hite,
published by #llyn B @acon in 1999. /ithin this reno0ned &nglish grammar and style
reference boo), is found only one reference to capitali,ation, located 0ithin the ;lossary
at 8&ro&er noun,8 page 92, 0here it states7
8The name of a particular person 19ran) 'inatra3, place 1@oston3, or thing 1Moby <ic)3.
"roper nouns are capitali,ed.8
There(s an obvious and legally evident difference bet0een capitali,ing
the first letter of a proper name as compared to capitali,ing every letter used to portray
the name.
T5% A4%&ican H%&ita=% Eoo$ o+ En=(i65 U6a=%
The American Heritage *ook of )nglish +sage, A Practical and Authoritati%e
Guide to Contem&orary )nglish, published in 1996, at 4hapter 9, )-Mail, Con%entions
and .uirks, Informality, states7
8To give a message special emphasis, an &Cmailer may 0rite entirely in capital letters, a
device &Cmailers refer to as screaming. 'ome of these visual conventions have emerged
as a0ay of getting around the constraints on data transmission that no0 limit many
net0or)s8.
ere is a reference source, 0ithin contemporary > modern > &nglish, that states
it is of an informal manner to 0rite every 0ord of > specifically > an electronic
message, a.).a. eCmail, in capital letters. They say it(s 8screaming8 to do so. @y standard
definition, 0e presume that is the same as shouting or yelling. #re all -udges, as 0ell as
their court cler)s and attorneys, shouting at us 0hen they corrupt our proper names in
this manner+ 1*f so, 0hat happened to the decorum of a court if everyone is yelling+3
*s the insurance company screaming at us for paying the increased premium on
our "olicy+ This is doubtful as to any standard generali,ation, even though specific
individual instances may indicate this to be true. *t is safe to conclude, ho0ever, that it
0ould also be informal to 0rite a proper name in the same 0ay.
<oes this also imply that those in the legal profession are 0riting our
4hristian names informally on court documents+ #re not attorneys and the courts
supposed to be specific, formally 0riting all legal documents to the 8letter of the la0+8
*f the la0 is at once both precise and not precise, 0hat is its significance, credibility,
and force and effect+
!e0 O5ford <ictionary of &nglish
8The "e# !$ford (ictionary of )nglish8 is published by the
O5ford $niversity "ress. @esides being considered the foremost authority on the
@ritish &nglish language, this dictionary is also designed to reflect the 0ay language is
used today through e5ample sentences and phrases. /e submit the follo0ing definitions
from the 199A edition7
"roper noun 1also proper name3. !oun. # name used for an individual person, place,
ororgani,ation, spelled 0ith an initial capital letter, e.g. Jane, %ondon, and O5fam.
!ame. !oun 1 # 0ord or set of 0ords by 0hich a person, animal, place, or thing is
)no0n,addressed, or referred to7 my name is "arsons, John "arsons. Lal)0asser is the
;erman name for lime0ater. Merb K *dentify by name: give the correct name for7 the
dead man has been named as John Mac)intosh. "hrases. J *n the name of. @earing or
using the name of aspecified person or organi,ation7 a driving license in the name of
/illiam 'anders.
9rom the 8"e#bury House (ictionary of American )nglish,8 published by
Monroe #llen "ublishers, *nc., 1199937
name n. * H4I a 0ord by 0hich a person, place, or thing is )no0n7
Her name is (iane (aniel.
/e can find absolutely no e5ample in any recogni,ed reference boo) that
specifies or allo0s the use of all capitali,ed names, proper or common. There is no doubt
that a proper name, to be grammatically correct, must be 0ritten 0ith only the first letter
capitali,ed, 0ith the remainder of the 0ord in a name spelled 0ith lo0er case letters.
US Go'%&n4%nt Sty(% Dan#a(
*s the spelling and usage of a proper name defined officially by $' ;overnment+
/es. The $nited 'tates ;overnment "rinting Office in their 8Style Manual,8 March 19A2
edition 1the most recent edition published as of March K0003, provides comprehensive
grammar, style and usage for all government publications, including court and
legal 0riting.
4hapter J, 8Ca&itali0ation,8 at N J.K, prescribes rules for proper names7
8"roper names are capitali,ed. H&5amples given areI Gome, @russels, John Macadam,
Macadam family, *taly, #ngloC'a5on.8
#t 4hapter 1D, 8Court#ork, the rules of ca&itali0ation,8 as mentioned in
4hapter J, are further reiterated7
81D.1. 4ourt0or) differs in style from other 0or) only as set forth in this section:
other0ise the style prescribed in the preceding sections 0ill be follo0ed.8
#fter reading N1D in entirety, * found no other references that 0ould change the
grammatical rules and styles specified in 4hapter J pertaining to capitali,ation.
#t N 1D.9, this same official $' ;overnment manual states7
8*n the titles of cases the first letter of all principal 0ords are capitali,ed, but not such
terms as defendant and appellee.8
This 0holly agrees 0ith Te5as %a0 Gevie0(s Manual on 8+sage 1 Style8
as referenced above.
&5amples sho0n in N 1D.1K are also consistent 0ith the aforementioned N1D.9
specification7 that is, all proper names are to be spelled 0ith capital first letters: the
balance of each spelled 0ith lo0er case letters.
G&a44a&9 P#nct#ation9 an* a7ita(i:ation
8The "ational Aeronautics and S&ace Administration8 1!#'#3 has publish
one of the most concise $' ;overnment resources on capitali,ation.
!#'# publication '" CD0A2 , 8Grammar, Punctuation, and Ca&itali0ation.8 # andboo)
for Technical /riters and &ditors, 0as compiled and 0ritten by the !#'# %angley
Gesearch 4enter in ampton, Mirginia. #t 4hapter 2, 8Ca&itali0ation,8 they state
in 2.1 8Introduction78
89irst 0e should define terms used 0hen discussing capitali,ation7
O #ll caps means that every letter in an e5pression is capital, %*L& T*'.
O 4aps B lc means that the principal 0ords of an e5pression are
capitali,ed, %i)e This.
O 4aps and small caps refer to a particular font of type containing small
capital letters instead of lo0ercase letters.
&lements in a document such as headings, titles, and captions may be capitali,ed in either
sentence style or headline style7
O 'entence style calls for capitali,ation of the first letter, and proper nouns
of course.
O eadline style calls for capitali,ation of all principal 0ords 1also called
caps B lc3.
Modern publishers tend to0ard a do0n style of capitali,ation, that is, to0ard use of fe0er
capitals, rather than an up style.8
ere 0e see that in headlines, titles, captions, and in sentences, there is no
authori,ed usage of all caps. #t 2.2.1. 8Ca&itali0ation 2ith Acronyms,8 0e find the first
authoritative use for all caps7
8#cronyms are al0ays formed 0ith capital letters. #cronyms are often coined for a
particular program or study and therefore re6uire definition. The letters of the acronym
are not capitali,ed in the definition unless the acronym stands for a proper name7
/rong C The best electronic publishing systems combine /hat Pou 'ee *s /hat
Pou ;et 1/P'*/P;3 features...
4orrect C The best electronic publishing systems combine 0hat you see is 0hat
you get 1/P'*/P;3 features...
@ut %angley is involved 0ith the !ational #eroC'pace "lane 1!#'"3 "rogram.?
This cites, by e5ample, that using all caps is allo0able in an acronym.
8Acronyms8 are 0ords formed from the initial letters of successive parts of a term.
They never contain periods and are often not standard, so that definition is re6uired.
4ould this apply to la0ful proper 4hristian names+ *f that 0ere true, then JO! 'M*T
0ould have to follo0 a definition of some sort, 0hich it does not. 9or e5ample, only if
JO! 'M*T 0ere defined as (John Orley olistic !utrition of the 'mith Medical
*nstitute To olistics 1JO! 'M*T3( 0ould this apply.
The most significant section appears at 2.E., 8Administrati%e "ames87
8Official designations of political divisions and of other organi,ed bodies
are capitali,ed7
O !ames of political divisions:
O 4anada, !e0 Por) 'tate:
O $nited 'tates !orth0est Territories:
O Mirgin *slands, Ontario "rovince:
O !ames of governmental units, $' ;overnment &5ecutive <epartment,
$' 4ongress, $' #rmy:
O $' !avy.?
#ccording to this official $' ;overnment publication, the 'tates are never to be
spelled in all caps such as =!&/ POGL 'T#T&.? The proper &nglish grammar
> and legal > style is ="e# /ork State.? This agrees, once again, 0ith Te5as %a0.
Review's Manual on Usage & Style.
T5% U6% o+ a L%=a( Fiction
The Real ife !ictionary of the aw
The authors of 8The 3eal Life (ictionary of the La#,8 ;erald and Lathleen ill,
are accomplished scholars and 0riters. ;erald ill is an e5perienced attorney, -udge, and
la0 instructor. ere is ho0 the term legal fiction is described7
8%egal fiction. n. # presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience,
consistency orto achieve -ustice. There is an old adage7 9ictions arise from the la0, and
not la0 from fictions.(
"ran's !ictionary of the aw
9rom Oran(s 8(ictionary of the La#,8 published by the /est ;roup 1999,
0ithin the definition of 84iction8 is found7
8# legal fiction is an assumption that something that is 1or may be3 false or none5istent is
true or real. %egal fictions are assumed or invented to help do -ustice. 9or e5ample,
bringing a la0suit to thro0 a none5istent QJohn <oeR off your property used to be the
only 0ay to establish a clear right to the property 0hen legal title 0as uncertain.8
D%&&ia4;W%b6t%&<6 Dictiona&y o+ La>
8Merriam-2ebster5s (ictionary of La#8 1996 states7
8legal fiction7 something assumed in la0 to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of
that assumption. &5ample7 the legal fiction that a day has no fractions > 9ields M.
9airban)s !orth 'tar @orough, A1A ".Kd 6EA 119913.8
This is the reason behind the use of all caps 0hen 0riting a proper name. The $'
and 'tate ;overnments are deliberately using a legal fiction to 8address8 the la0ful, real,
fleshCandCblood man or 0oman. /e say this is deliberate because their o0n official
publications state that proper names are not to be 0ritten in all caps. They are
deliberately not follo0ing their o0n recogni,ed authorities.
*n the same respect, by identifying their o0n government entity in all caps,
they are legally stating that it is also intended to be a legal fiction. #s stated
by <r. Mary !e0ton @ruder in the beginning of this memorandum, the use of all caps for
0riting a proper name is an 8internal style8 for 0hat is apparently a preCdetermined usage
and, at this point, un)no0n -urisdiction.
The main )ey to a legal fiction is assumption as noted in each definition above.
4onclusion7 There are no official or unofficial &nglish grammar style manuals or
reference publications that recogni,e the use of all caps 0hen 0riting a proper name. To
do so is by fiat, 0ithin and out of an undisclosed -urisdiction by un)no0n people for
unrevealed reasons, by -uristic license of arbitrary presumption not based on fact. The
authors of the process unilaterally create legal fictions for their o0n reasons and set about
to get us to ta)e the bait, fall for the deceit.
A66#47tion o+ a L%=a( Fiction
#n important issue concerning this entire matter is 0hether or not a proper name,
perverted into an all caps assemblage of letters, can be substituted for a la0ful
4hristian name or any proper name, such as the 'tate of 9lorida. *s the assertion of allC
capitalCletter names 8legal+8 *f so, from 0here does this practice originate and 0hat
enforces it+
# legal fiction may be employed 0hen the name of a =&erson? is not )no0n, and
therefore using the fictitious name =6ohn (oe? as a tentative, or interim artifice to
surmount the absence of true )no0ledge until the true name is )no0n. $pon discovering
the identity of the fictitious name, the true name replaces it.
*n all cases, a legal fiction is an assumption of purported fact 0ithout having
sho0n the fact to be true or valid. *t is an acceptance 0ith no proof. 'imply, to assume
is to pretend. Oran(s 8(ictionary of the La#8 says that the 0ord =assume? means7
1. To ta)e up or ta)e responsibility for: to receive: to underta)e.
'ee 8assum&tion.8
K. To pretend.
J. To accept 0ithout proof.
These same basic definitions are used by nearly all of the modern
la0 dictionaries. *t should be noted that there is a difference bet0een the meanings of
the second and third definitions 0ith that of the first. "retending and accepting 0ithout
proof are of the same understanding and meaning. o0ever, to ta)e responsibility for
and receive, or assumption, does not have the same meaning. Oran(s defines
=assum&tion? as7
89ormally transforming someone else(s debt into your o0n debt. 4ompare 0ith
guaranty. The assumption of a mortgage usually involves ta)ing over the seller(s
(mortgage debt( 0hen buying a property 1often a house3.8
!o0, 0hat happens if all the meanings for the 0ord 8assume8 are combined+
*n a literal and definitive sense, the meaning of assume 0ould be7 The pretended
acceptance, 0ithout proof, that someone has ta)en responsibility for, has guaranteed,
or has received a debt.
Therefore, if 0e apply all this in defining a legal fiction, the use of a legal fiction
is an assumption or pretension that the legal fiction named has received and is responsible
for a debt of some sort.
$se of the legal fiction = 6!H" P 6!")S ? in place of the proper name
= 6ohn Paul 6ones ? implies an assumed debt guarantee 0ithout any offer of proof .
The danger behind this is that if such an unproven assumption is made, unless the
assumption is proven 0rong it is considered valid.
#n assumed debt is valid unless proven other0ise. 1=An unrebutted affida%it,
claim, or charge stands as the truth in commerce.?3 This is in accord 0ith the
$niform 4ommercial 4ode , valid in every 'tate and made a part of the 'tatutes of
each 'tate. # name 0ritten in all caps > resembling a proper name but grammatically
not a proper name > is being held as a debtor for an assumed debt. <id the parties to the
4omplaint incur that debt+ *f so, ho0 and 0hen+
/here is the contract of indebtedness that 0as signed and the proof of default
thereon+ /hat happens if the proper name, i.e. =6ohn Paul 6ones,? ans0ers for or
assumes the fabricated name, i.e. =6!H" P 6!")S+? The t0o become one and
the same . This is the cru5 for the use of the all caps names by the $' ;overnment and
the 'tates. *t is the 0ay that they can bring someone into the 8de facto8 venue and
-urisdiction that they have created. @y implication of definition, this also is for the
purpose of some manner of assumed debt.
/hy 0on(t they use 8The State of Te$as8 or 86ohn (oe8 in their courts or
on <river(s %icenses+ /hat stops them from doing this+ Obviously, there is a reason for
using the allCcaps names since they are very capable of 0riting proper names -ust as their
o0n official style manual states. The reason behind 8legal fictions8 is found 0ithin the
definitions as cited above.
T5% L%=a(iti%6 o+ A((;a7ita(;L%tt%&6 Na4%6
/e could go on for hundreds of pages citing the legal basis behind the creation
and use of allCcapitalCletters names. *n a nutshell, fabricated legal persons such as
=STAT) !4 T)7AS? can be used to fabricate additional legal persons. 84ictions8 arise
from the la0, not the la0 from fictions. @astard legal persons originate from any
-udicial.governmental actor that 0hishes to create them, regardless of 0hether he.she.it is
empo0ered by la0 to do so. o0ever, a la0 can never originate from a fictional
foundation that doesn(t e5ist.
The generic and original $' 4onstitution 0as validated by treaty bet0een
individual nation states 1all of #hich are artificial, cor&orate entities since they e$ist in
abstract idea and construct3. 4ontained 0ithin it is the re6uired due process of la0 for
all the participating nation states of that treaty. Gepresentatives of the people in each
nation state agreed upon and signed it. The federal government is not only created by it,
but is also bound to operate 0ithin the guidelines of 4onstitutional due process.
#ny purported la0 that does not originate from 4onstitutional due process is a
fictional la0 0ithout validity . Thus, the true test of any #merican la0 is its basis of
due process according to the organic $' 4onstitution. /as it created according to the
la0ful process or created outside of la0ful process+
E)%c#ti'% O&*%&6 an* Di&%cti'%6
9or years many have researched the la0ful basis for creating allCcaps
-uristic persons and have concluded that there is no such foundation according to
valid la0s and due process. @ut 0hat about those purported 8la#s8 that are not valid and
have not originated from constitutional due process+ There(s a very simple ans0er to the
creation of such purported la0s that are really not la0s at all7 8)$ecuti%e !rders8 and
8(irecti%es.8 They are 8color of la#8 0ithout being valid la0s of due process.
These 8)$ecuti%e !rders8 and 8(irecti%es8 have the appearance of la0 and loo) as if
they are la0s, but according to due process, they are not la0s. Gather, they are 8la#s8
based on fictional beginnings and are the inherently defective basis for additional
fictional 8la#s8 and other legal fictions. They are 8regulated8 and 8&romulgated8
by #dministrative 4ode, rules and procedures, not due process. 4urrently,
&5ecutive Orders are enforced through the charade )no0n as the 9ederal #dministrative
"rocedures #ct . &ach 'tate has also adopted the same fatally fla0ed
administrative 8la0s.8
Linco(n E6tab(i65%6 E)%c#ti'% O&*%&6
&ightyCfive years after the *ndependence of the united 'tates, seven southern
nation 'tates of #merica 0al)ed out of the 'econd 'ession of the thirtyCsi5th 4ongress
on March KD, 1A61. *n so doing, the 4onstitutional due process 6uorum necessary
for 4ongress to vote 0as lost and 4ongress 0as ad-ourned sine die, or 8#ithout day.8
This meant that there 0as no la0ful 6uorum to set a specific day and time to reconvene
0hich, according to Gobert(s Gules of Order, dissolved 4ongress. This dissolution
automatically too) place because there are no provisions 0ithin the 4onstitution allo0ing
the passage of any 4ongressional vote 0ithout a 6uorum of the 'tates.
%incoln(s second &5ecutive Order of #pril 1A61 called 4ongress bac) into
session days later, but not under the la0ful authority, or la0ful due process, of
the 4onstitution. 'olely in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the +S Military,
%incoln called 4ongress into session under authority of Martial La#. 'ince #pril
of 1A61, 8Congress8 has not met based on la0ful due process. The current 8Congress8 is
a legal fiction based on nothing more meritorious than =/eah, so #hat are you going to
do about it+? aving a monopoly on the currency, =la#,? and 0hat passes for
=go%ernment,? and most of the 0orldRs firepo0er, the motto of the "o0ers That @e is7
=2e8%e got #hat it takes to take #hat you8%e got.?
%egalCfiction 8la#s,8 such as the Geconstruction #cts and the implementation of
the %ieber 4ode, 0ere instituted by %incoln soon thereafter and became the basis for the
current 8la#s8 in the $'. &very purported 8Act8 in effect today is 8de facto,8 based on
colorable fictitious entities created arbitrarily, out of nothing, 0ithout verification,
la0ful foundation, or la0ful due process. #ll of such =la#s? are not la0, but rules
of rulership by force.con6uest, originating from and e5isting in military, martial la0
-urisdiction. Military, martial la0 -urisdiction
S -urisdiction of 0ar
S 0in.lose interactions consisting of eating or being eaten, living or dying
S food chain
S la0 of necessity
S suspension of all la0 other than complete freedom to act in any manner to eat,
)ill, or destroy or avoid being eaten, )illed, or destroyed
S no la0
S la0lessness
S complete absence of all la0ful basis to create any valid la0.
4ontractually, being a victim of those acting on the alleged authority granted by
the la0 of necessity,
S no la0ful ob-ect, valuable consideration, free consent of all involved parties,
absence offraud, duress, malice, and undue influence
S no bona fide, enforceable contract
S no valid, enforceable ne5us
S absolute right to engage in any action of any )ind in selfCdefense
S complete and total right to disregard any alleged -urisdiction and demands from
selfCadmitted outla0s committing na)ed criminal aggression 0ithout any
credibility and right to demand allegiance and compliance from anyone.
&very "resident of the $nited 'tates since %incoln has functioned by
&5ecutive Orders issued from a military, martial la0 -urisdiction 0ith the only =la#?
being the =la# of necessity,? i.e. the /ar "o0ers. The /ar "o0ers are nothing ne0.
*ndeed, they have been operational from the instant the first man thought he 0ould
=hide from God,? try to cheat ethical and natural la0 by over reaching, invade the space
and territory of others, covet other peopleRs land or property, steal the fruits of their
labors, and attempt to succeed in life by 0in.lose games. #ll e5isting =authority?
in the $nited 'tates today derives e5clusively from the /ar "o0ers.
TrumanRs reCaffirmation of operational authority under the /ar "o0ers begins7
="!2, TH)3)4!3), I, HA33/ S. T3+MA", President of the +nited States
of America, acting under and by %irtue of the authority %ested in me by section 9:b; of
the Trading #ith the )nemy Act of !ctober <, =>=?, @A Stat. @=9, as amended
:section 9:b; of A&&endi$ to Title 9A;, and section @ of the act of March >, =>BB,
@C Stat. D. ...E 'ic transit rights, substance, truth, -ustice, peace, and freedom in #merica,
Fthe land of the free and the home of the bra%e.?
T5% Abo(ition o+ t5% En=(i65 K A4%&ican o44on La>
ere(s an interesting 6uote from the 19DJ session of the $' 'upreme 4ourt7
8The #merican la0. *n this country, the la0 in effect in all but a fe0 'tates until midC
l9th century 0as the preCe5isting &nglish common la0... *t 0as not until after the /ar
@et0een the 'tates that legislation began generally to replace the common la0.8 T Goe
vs. /ade, 210 $' 11J.
*n effect, %incoln(s second &5ecutive Order abolished the recogni,ed
&nglish common la0 in #merica and replaced it 0ith 8la#s8 based on a fictional legal
foundation, i.e., &5ecutive Orders and <irectives e5ecuted under =authority? of
the /ar "o0ers. Most 'tates still have a reference to the common la0s 0ithin their
present day statutes. 9or e5ample, in the 9lorida 'tatutes 119993, Title *. 4hapter K,
at N K.01 8Common la# and certain statutes declared in force,8 it states7
8The common and statute la0s of &ngland 0hich are of a general and not a local nature,
0ith the e5ception hereinafter mentioned, do0n to the 2
th
day of July, 1DD6, are declared
to be of force in this state: provided, the said statutes and common la0 be not inconsistent
0ith the 4onstitution and la0s of the $nited 'tates and the acts of the %egislature of this
state. istory. CC s. l, !ov. 6, 1AK9: G' E9: ;' E9: G;' D1: 4;% AD.8

!ote that the basis of the common la0 is an approved #ct of the people of 9lorida
by Gesolution on !ovember 6, 1AK9, prior to %incoln(s 4ivil /ar. #lso note that the
subse6uent 8la#s,8 as a result of #cts of the 9lorida %egislature and the $nited 'tates,
no0 ta)e priority over the common la0 in 9lorida. *n #pril 1A61, the #merican and
&nglish common la0 0as abolished and replaced 0ith legal fiction 8la#s,8 a.).a. 'tatutes,
Gules, and 4odes based on &5ecutive Order and not the due process specified 0ithin the
organic 4onstitution. &5isting and functioning under the la0 of necessity ab initio, they
are all nonCla0 and cannot validly assert -urisdiction, authority, or demand for
compliance from anyone. They are entirely =rules of rulershi&,? i.e. organi,ed piracy,
privilege, plunder, and enslavement, invented and enforced by those 0ho 0ould rule over
others by legali,ed violence in the complete absence of moral authority, ade6uate
)no0ledge, and naturalCla0 mechanics to accomplish any results other than disruption,
conflict, damage, and devastation. The established ma5im of la0 applies7
Extra territorium just dicenti non paretur impune. One 0ho e5ercises
-urisdiction out of his territory cannot be obeyed 0ith impunity.
10 4o. DD : <ig. K. 1. K0 :
'tory, 4onfl. %a0s N EJ9 :
@room, Ma5. 100, 101 .
#$$lying it all to %urrent &laws&
#n established ma5im of la0 states the importance of the name7
Ad recte docendum oportet, primum inquirere nomina, quia rerum cognitio a
nominibusrerum dependet. *n order rightly to comprehend a thing, in6uire first into the
names, for a right )no0ledge of things depends upon their names.
4o. %itt. 6A .
Title ***, 8Pleadings and Motions,8 Gule 91a3 8Ca&acity,8 9ederal Gules of
4ivil "rocedure , states, in pertinent part7
8/hen an issue is raised as to the legal e5istence of a named party, or the party(s capacity
to be sued, or the authority of a party to be sued, the party desiring to raise the issue shall
do so by specific negative averment, 0hich shall include supporting particulars.8
#t this -uncture, it is clear that the e5istence of a name 0ritten 0ith all caps is a
necessityCcreated legal fiction. This is surely an issue to be raised and the supporting
particulars are outlined 0ithin this memorandum. $se of the proper name must be
insisted upon as a matter of abatement > correction > for all parties of an action of
purported 8la#.8 o0ever, the current 8courts8 cannot correct this since they are all
based on presumed.assumed fictional la0 and must use artificial, -uristic names. *nstead,
they e5pect the la0ful 4hristian man or 0oman to accept the allCcaps name and agree by
silence to be treated as if he or she 0ere a fictional entity invented and governed by
mortal enemies. They must go to unlimited lengths to deceive and coerce this
compliance or the underlying criminal farce 0ould be e5posed and a 0orldC0ide
plunder.enslavement rac)et that has held all of life on this planet in a vice grip for
millennia 0ould crumble and liberate every living thing. #t this point the 0ouldCbe
rulers of the 0orld 0ould be re6uired to succeed in life by honest, productive labors the
0ay those upon 0hom they parasitically feed are forced to conduct their lives.
O$(a5o4a Stat#t%6
'ince the entire game functions on the basis of peopleRs failure to properly rebut a
rebuttable presumption, the issue then becomes ho0 to properly rebut their presumption
that you are )no0ingly, intentionally, and voluntarily agreeing to be treated as if you
0ere the allCcaps name. One angle of approach is found in the re6uirement for proper
names to be identified in any legal dispute. This includes a mandate to correct the legal
paper0or) involved 0hen proper names are provided. *n regard to criminal prosecution
this is clearly set forth in the O)lahoma 'tatutes, 4hapter KK, N 20J7
8/hen a defendant is indicted or prosecuted by a fictitious or erroneous name, and in any
stage of the proceedings his true name is discovered, it must be inserted in the subse6uent
proceedings, referring to the fact of his being charged by the name mentioned in the
indictment or information.8
A4%&ican J#&i67&#*%nc%
*n general, it is essential to identify parties to court actions properly. *f the
alleged parties to an action are not precisely identified, then 0ho is involved 0ith 0hom
or 0hat, and ho0+ *f not properly identified, all corresponding -udgments are void, as
outlined in Molume 26, #merican Jurisprudence Kd, at 86udgments78
8N 100 "arties > # -udgment should identify the parties for and against 0hom it is
rendered, 0ith such certainty that it may be readily enforced, and a -udgment 0hich does
not do so may be regarded as void for uncertainty. 'uch identification may be achieved
by naming the persons for and against 0hom the -udgment is rendered. Technical
deficiencies in the naming of the persons for and against 0hom -udgment is rendered can
be corrected if the parties are not pre-udiced. # reference in a -udgment to a party plainly
liable, follo0ed by an omission of that party(s name from the language of the decree, at
least gives rise to an ambiguity and calling for an in6uiry into the court(s real intention as
reflected in the entire record and surrounding circumstances.8 H9ootnote numbers and
cites are omitted.I
T5% 7&%6%nt 6it#ation in A4%&ica
# legal person S a legal fiction
One of the terms used predominantly by the present civil governments and courts
in #merica is =legal &erson.? Just 0hat is a legal person+ 'ome definitions are7
H#I legal $erson7 a body of persons or an entity 1as a corporation3 considered as having
many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and especially the capacity to
sue and be sued. MerriamC/ebster(s <ictionary of %a0 119963.
'erson. *. # human being 1a 8natural8 person3. K. # corporation
1an 8artificial8 person3. 4orporations are treated as persons in many legal situations.
#lso, the 0ord 8&erson8 includes corporations in most definitions in this dictionary. J.
#ny other 8being8 entitled to sue as a legal entity 1a government, an association, a group
of Trustees, etc.3. 2. The plural of person is persons, not people 1see that 0ord3. >
Oran(s 8(ictionary of the La#,8 /est ;roup 119993.
'erson. #n entity 0ith legal rights and e5istence including the ability to sue and be sued,
to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by la0yer
and, generally, other po0ers incidental to the full e5pression of the entity in la0.
*ndividuals are 8&ersons8 in la0 unless they are minors or under some )ind of other
incapacity such as acourt finding of mental incapacity. Many la0s give certain po0ers to
8&ersons8 0hich, in almost all instances, includes business organi,ations that have been
formally registered such as partnerships, corporations or associations. CC <uhaime(s %a0
<ictionary.
'ERS"(, noun. per(sn. H%atin persona: said to be compounded of per, through or by,
and sonus, sound: a %atin 0ord signifying primarily a mas) used by actors on the stage.I
CC /ebster(s 1AKA <ictionary.
# corporation incorporated under de -ure la0, i.e. by bona fide e5press contract
bet0een real beings capable of contracting, is a legal fact. $sing the -uristic artifice of
=&resum&tion,? or =assum&tion? 1a device )no0n as a =legal fiction?3, implied contract,
constructive trusts, another entirely separate entity can be created using the name of the
bona fide corporate legal fact 1the name of the corporation3 by altering the name of the
corporation into some other corrupted format, such as #%%C4#"*T#% %&TT&G'
or abbreviated 0ords in the name. The corporation e5ists in la0, but has arbitrarily been
assigned another !#M&. !o such corporation 1legal fact3, nor any valid la0, nor even a
valid legal fiction, can be created under the =la# of necessity,? i.e. under =no la#.?
%i)e0ise, the arbitrary use of the legalCfiction artifice of =right of &resum&tion?
1over un0ary, uninformed, and usually blindly trusting people3 can be legitimately
e5ercised under =no la#.? #nything 0hatsoever done under alleged authority of na)ed
criminal aggression, i.e. la0 of necessity, can be rendered legitimate. Ma5ims of la0
describing =necessity? include7
O ="ecessity has no la#.? "lo0d. 1A, and 1E Min. #br. EJ2: KK id. E20 .
O =In time of #ar, la#s are silent.? 4icero.
!onCe5istent la0, the legal condition that universally prevails in the official
systems of the 0orld today, means that no la0ful basis e5ists upon 0hich anything can be
created, or be made to transpire, upon 0hich basis allegiance and obedience can be
legitimately demanded. #cting under the la0 of necessity, i.e. la0lessness, allo0s
complete and total right of everyone to disregard any and all alleged assertions of
any la0ful, verifiable, and legitimate -urisdiction over anything or anyone.
#nyone acting against anyone under such nonCla0 is selfCconfessing to be a na)ed
criminal aggressor, and con man 0ho has forfeited all credibility and right to demand
allegiance, obedience, or compliance 0ith any -urisdiction he might assert. *f you, as a
real being, are in real la0 and it is impossible for an attorney or -udge to recogni,e or
access it, you are not 1and cannot be made sub-ect to by them3 in their -urisdiction.
The crucial issue is then ho0 to notice them of your position and standing.
# person created under de -ure la0, 0ith the personRs identifying name appearing
as prescribed by la0 and according to the rules of &nglish grammar, is a legal fact.
# corrupted =alter ego? version of that name, manufactured under the legal fiction of
=right of &resum&tion? 0ill have =credibility? only so long as the presumption remains
unchallenged. The rule of the 0orld is that anything and everything s)ates unless you
bust it.
L%=a( o& La>+#(!
*t is crucial to define the difference bet0een 8legal8 and 8la#ful.8 The generic
4onstitution references genuine la0. The present civil authorities and their courts use the
0ord 8legal.8 *s there a difference in the meanings+ The follo0ing is 6uoted from
# <ictionary of %a0 11A9J37
awful. *n accordance 0ith the la0 of the land: according to the la0: permitted,
sanctioned, or -ustified by la0. 8La#ful8 properly implies a thing conformable to or
en-oined by la0: 8Legal,8 a thing in the form or after the manner of la0 or binding by
la0. # 0rit or 0arrant issuing from any court, under color of la0, is a 8legal8 process
ho0ever defective. 'ee 8legal.8 H@old emphasis addedI
egal. %atin legalis. "ertaining to the understanding, the e5position, the administration,
the science and the practice of la07 as, the legal profession, legal advice: legal blan)s,
ne0spaper. *mplied or imputed in la0. Opposed to actual 8Legal8 loo)s more to the
letter Hform.appearanceI, and 8La#ful8 to the spirit Hsubstance.contentI, of the la0.
8Legal8 is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of la0: 8La#ful8 for accord
0ith ethical principle. 8Legal8 imports rather that the forms HappearancesI of la0 are
observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been
obeyed: 8La#ful8 that the right is act full in substance, that moral 6uality is secured.
8Legal8 is the antithesis of e6uitable, and the e6uivalent of constructive. K #bbott(s %a0
<ic. K2 . H@old emphasis addedI
%egal matters administrate, conform to, and follo0 rules. They are e6uitable in
nature and are implied 1presumed3 rather than actual 1e5press3. # legal process can be
defective in la0. This accords 0ith the previous discussions of legal fictions and
color of la0. To be legal, a matter does not have to follo0 the la0. *nstead, it conforms
to and follo0s the rules or form of la0. This is 0hy the 9ederal and 'tate Gules of 4ivil
and 4riminal "rocedure are cited in every court "etition so as to conform to legal
re6uirements of the specific -uristic persons named, e.g., =STAT) !4 G)!3GIA? or the
=+.S. 4)()3AL G!G)3"M)"T? that rule the courts.
%a0ful matters are ethically en-oined in the la0 of the land > the la0 of
the people > and are actual in nature, not implied. This is 0hy 0hatever true la0 0as
upheld by the organic 4onstitution has no bearing or authority in the present day
legal courts. *t is impossible for anyone in =authority? today to access, or even ta)e
cogni,ance of, true la0 since =authority? is the =la# of necessity,? 1K $'4 9E.
Therefore, it 0ould appear that the meaning of the 0ord =legal? is =color of la#,?
a term 0hich @lac)Rs %a0 <ictionary, 9ifth &dition, defines as7
%olor of law. The appearance or semblance, 0ithout the substance, of legal right.
Misuse of po0er, possessed by virtue of state la0 and made possible only because
0rongdoer is clothed 0ith authority of state, is action ta)en under =color of la#.?
@lac)Rs %a0 <ictionary, 9ifth &dition, page K21.
E)%c#ti'% O&*%&6 &#(% t5% (an*
The current situation is that legalism has usurped and engulfed the la0.
The administration of legal rules, codes, and statutes no0 prevail instead of actual la0.
This ta)es place on a 9ederal as 0ell as 'tate level. ;overnment administrates 0hat it
has created through its o0n purported 8la#s,8 0hich are not la0ful, but merely =legal.?
They are arbitrary constructs e5isting only because of the actions of people acting on
fictitious 1selfCcreated3 authority, i.e. no authority: they are authori,ed and enforced by
legal &5ecutive Orders. &5ecutive Orders are not la0ful and never have been. #s you
read the follo0ing, be a0are of the 0ords 8code8 and 8administration.8
%oo)ing at the $nited 'tates 4ensus K000 reveals that the legal authority for this
census comes from 8!ffice of Management and *udget8 10M@3
#pproval !o. 060D C0AE6 . The 0M@ is a part of the &5ecutive Office of the "resident of
the $nited 'tates. The $.'. 4ensus @ureau is responsible for implementing the
national census, 0hich is a division of the 8)conomics and Statistics Administration8 of
the $.'. <epartment of 4ommerce 1$'<O43. The $'<O4 is a department of the
&5ecutive @ranch. Obviously, 4ensus K000 is authori,ed, carried out, controlled,
enforced and implemented by the "resident > the &5ecutive @ranch of the
9ederal ;overnment > functioning as it has been since 1A61, in the la0less realm of
necessity 10hich is no0 even more degenerate than 0hen it commenced under %incoln3.
*n fact, the &5ecutive Office of the "resident controls the entire nation through
various departments and agencies effecting -ustice, communications, health, energy,
transportation, education, defense, treasury, labor, agriculture, mails, and much more,
through a myriad of &5ecutive Orders, "roclamations, "olicies, and <ecisions.
&very $' "resident since %incoln has claimed his (authority( for these
&5ecutive Orders on #rticle **, 'ection K of the $.'. 4onstitution 7
8The "resident shall be commander in chief of the #rmy and !avy of the $nited 'tates,
and of the militia of the several states, 0hen called into the actual service of the $nited
'tates: U e shall have po0er, by and 0ith the advice and consent of the 'enate, to
ma)e treaties, provided t0o thirds of the 'enators present concur: and he shall nominate,
and by and 0ith the advice and consent of the 'enate, shall appoint ambassadors, other
public ministers and consuls, -udges of the 'upreme 4ourt, and all other officers of the
$nited 'tates, 0hose appointments are not herein other0ise provided for, and 0hich shall
be established by la07 but the 4ongress may by la0 vest the appointment of such inferior
officers, as they thin) proper, in the "resident alone, in the courts of la0, or in the heads
of departments.8
*n reality, the 4ongress is completely byCpassed. 'ince the 'enate 0as convened
in #pril, 1A61 by "residential &5ecutive Order !o. K , 1not by la0ful constitutional
due process3, there is no $nited 'tates 4ongress. The current =Senate? and =House? are,
li)e everything, =colorable? 1=color of Senate?3 under the direct authority of
the &5ecutive Office of the "resident. The "resident legally needs neither the consent nor
a vote from the 'enate simply because the 'enate(s legal authority to meet e5ists only
by &5ecutive Order. #mbassadors, public ministers, consuls, 9ederal -udges, and all
officers of the $!*T&< 'T#T&' are appointed by, and under authority of,
the &5ecutive Office of the "resident.
T5% F%*%&a( R%=i6t&y i6 an E)%c#ti'% +#nction
The first official act of every incoming "resident is to reCaffirm the /ar "o0ers.
e must do so, or he is devoid of po0er to function in office. The /ar "o0ers are set
forth in the Trading /ith The &nemy #ct of October 6, 191D, and the #mendatory #ct
of March 9, 19JJ 1The @an)ing Gelief #ct3. *n the #mendatory #ct, every citi,en of the
$nited 'tates 0as made an enemy of the ;overnment, i.e. the 9ederal Geserve.*M9, et al,
4reditors in ban)ruptcy 0ho have con6uered the country by their great paperCmoney
ban)ing s0indle.
9or the past 6E years, every "residential &5ecutive Order has become purported
8la#8 simply by its publication in the 9ederal Gegister, 0hich is operated by the
Office of the 9ederal Gegister 1O9G3. *n 19JE, the O9G 0as established by
the 9ederal Gegister #ct . The purported authority for the O9G is found 0ithin the
$nited 'tates 4ode, Title 22, at 4hapter 1E 7
8N 1E06. #dministrative 4ommittee of the 9ederal Gegister: establishment and
composition: po0ers and duties
The #dministrative 4ommittee of the 9ederal Gegister shall consist of the #rchivist of
the $nited 'tates or #cting #rchivist, 0ho shall be chairman, an officer of the
<epartment of Justice designated by the #ttorney ;eneral, and the "ublic "rinter or
#cting "ublic "rinter. The <irector of the 9ederal Gegister shall act as secretary of the
committee. The committee shall prescribe, 0ith the approval of the "resident,
regulations for carrying out this chapter.8
!otice that the entire #dministrative 4ommittee of the 9ederal Gegister is
comprised of officers of the 9ederal ;overnment. /ho appoints all 9ederal officers+
The "resident does. This =act? also gives the "resident the authority to decree all the
regulations to carry out the act. @y this monopoly the &5ecutive establishes, controls,
regulates, and enforces the 9ederal ;overnment 0ithout need for any approval from
the 'enate or anyone else 1other than his undisclosed superiors3. e operates 0ithout any
accountability to the people at all. o0 can this be considered la0ful+
*n 191D, "resident /oodro0 /ilson couldn(t persuade 4ongress to agree 0ith his
desire to arm $nited 'tates vessels traversing hostile ;erman 0aters before
the $nited 'tates entered /orld /ar *, so /ilson simply invo)ed the 8&olicy8 through
a "residential &5ecutive Order. "resident 9ran)lin <. Goosevelt issued &5ecutive Order
!o. 9066 in <ecember 1921 forcing 100,000 #mericans of Japanese descent to be
rounded up and placed in concentration camps 0hile all their property 0as confiscated.
*s it any 0onder that the 4ongress, 0hich the "resident =legally? controls, did not
impeach "resident /illiam Jefferson 4linton 0hen the evidence for impeachment 0as
over0helming+ On that note, 0hy is it that #ttorneyC"residents have used
&5ecutive Orders the most+ /ho, but an attorney, 0ould )no0 and understand
legal rules the best. 'adly, they enforce 0hat(s =legal? and ignore 0hat(s la0ful. *n fact,
they have no access to 0hat is la0ful since the entirety of their =authority,? 0hich is
ethically and e5istentially specious, derives from the /ar "o0ers.
Ho> *%bt i6 a66#4%* by (%=a( +iction6
/e no0 refer bac) to the matter of assumption, as already discussed, 0ith its
relationship to arbitrarily created -uristic persons, e.g. =STAT) !4 CALI4!3"IA?
or =6!H" P 6!")S.? 'ince an assumption, by definition, implies debt, 0hat debt does a
legal fiction assume+ !o0 that 0e have e5plored the legal > e5ecutive > basis of the
current 9ederal and 'tate governments, it(s time to put all this together.
The government use of all caps in place of proper names is absolutely no
mista)e. *t signifies an internal 1=legal?3 rule and authority. *ts foundation is pure
artifice and the results have compounded into more deceit in the form of created,
promulgated, instituted, administered, and enforced rules, codes, statutes, and
policy > i.e. =the la#s that a&&ear to be but are not, ne%er #ere, and ne%er can be.?
Qui sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus. e 0ho en-oys the benefit, ought
also to bear the burden. e 0ho en-oys the advantage of a right ta)es the
accompanying disadvantage > a privilege is sub-ect to its condition
or conditions. CC @ouvier(s Ma5ims of %a0 11AE63.
T5% Ei&t5 %&ti+icat%
'ince the early 1960(s, 'tate governments > themselves specially created,
-uristic, corporate persons signified by all caps > have issued @irth 4ertificates to
8&ersons8 0ith legal fiction allCcaps names. This is not a la0ful record of your
physical birth, but rather the birth of the -uristic, allCcaps name. *t may appear to be your
true name, but since no proper name is ever 0ritten in all caps 1either la0fully
or grammatically3 it does not identify 0ho you are. The @irth 4ertificate is the
governmentRs selfCcreated document of title for its ne0 =&ro&erty,? i.e. the deed to the
-uristicCname artificial person 0hose allCcaps name =mirrors? your true name.
The @irth 4ertificate brings the ne0 allCcaps name into colorable admiralty.maritime la0,
the same 0ay a ship 1and ship of state3 is berthed.
One important area to address, before going any further, is the governmental use
of older data storage from the late 19E0(s until the early 19A0(s. #s a 8left o%er8 from
various teletypeCoriented systems, many government data storage methods used all caps
for proper names. The *G' 0as supposedly still complaining about some of their
anti6uated storage systems as recent as the early 19A0(s. #t first, this may have been a
necessity of the technology at the time, not a deliberate act. "erhaps, 0hen this
technology 0as first being used and implemented into the mainstream of
communications, some legal e5perts sa0 it as a perfect tool for their perfidious
intentions. /hat better e5cuse could there be+
o0ever, since local, 'tate, and 9ederal offices primarily used type0riters during
that same time period, and @irth 4ertificates and other important documents, such as
driver(s licenses, 0ere produced 0ith type0riters, it(s very doubtful that this poses much
of an e5cuse to e5plain allCcaps usage for proper names. The only reasonable usage of
the older databan) allCcaps storage systems 0ould have been for addressing envelopes or
certain forms in bul), including payment chec)s, 0hich the governments did fre6uently.
#utomated computer systems, 0ith daisyC0heel and pin printers used prevalently
in the early 19A0(s, emulated the *@M electric type0riter 4ourier or elvetica fonts in
both upper and lo0er case letters. 'hortly thereafter, the introduction of laser and in)C-et
printers 0ith multiple fonts became the standard. 9or the past fifteen years, there is no
e5cuse that the government computers 0ill not accommodate the use of lo0er case letters
unless the older data is still stored in its original form, i.e. all caps, and has not been
translated due to the costs of reCentry. @ut this does not e5cuse the entry of ne0 data,
only 8legacy8 data. *n fact, on many government forms today, proper names are in all
caps 0hile other areas of the same computer produced document are in both upper and
lo0er case. One can only conclude that no0, more than ever, the use of all caps in
substitution the 0riting a proper name is no mista)e.
/hen a child is born, the hospital sends the original, not a copy, of the record of
live birth to the 8State *ureau of Gital Statistics,8 sometimes called the 8(e&artment of
Health and 3ehabilitati%e Ser%ices8 1G'3. &ach 'T#T& is re6uired to supply the
$!*T&< 'T#T&' 0ith birth, death, and health statistics. The 'T#T& agency that
receives the original record of live birth )eeps it and then issues a @irth 4ertificate in the
corrupted, allCcaps version of the babyRs true name, i.e. J#M&' /*%@&G 'M*T.
cer)tif)i)cate, noun. Middle &nglish certificat, from Middle 9rench, from Medieval
%atinceruficatum. from %ate %atin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to
certify, 1Eth century. J7 a document evidencing o0nership or debt.CC Merriam /ebster
<ictionary 1199A3.
The @irth 4ertificate issued by the 'tate is then registered 0ith the
$.'. <epartment of 4ommerce CC the &5ecutive Office CC specifically through their o0n
subCagency, the $.'. 4ensus @ureau, 0hich is responsible to register vital statistics from
all the 'tates. The 0ord 8registered,8 as it is used 0ithin commercial or legal based
e6uity la0, does not mean that the allCcaps name 0as merely noted in
a boo) for reference purposes. /hen a @irth 4ertificate is registered 0ith the
$.'. <epartment of 4ommerce, it means that the allCcaps legal person named thereon has
become a surety or guarantor, a condition and obligation that is automatically and
un0ittingly assumed unless you rebut the presumption by effectively noticing them7
=It ain8t me.?
registere*. 'ecurity, bond. CC MerriamC/ebster <ictionary of %a0 119963.
Security. * a7 'omething 1as a mortgage or collateral3 that is provided to
ma)e certain the fulfillment of anobligation. &5ample7 used his property
as security for a loan. lb7 8surety.8 K7 &vidence of indebtedness,
o0nership, or the right to o0nership. CC *bid.
+on*. * a7 # usually formal 0ritten agreement by 0hich a person
underta)es to perform a certain act 1as fulfill the obligations of a
contract3 . . 0ith the condition that failure to perform or abstain 0ill
obligate the person . . to pay a sum of money or 0ill result in the forfeiture
of money put up by the person or surety. lb7 One 0ho acts as a surety. K7
#n interestCbearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a
government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on
property and is often designed to ta)e care of a particular financial need.
CC *bid.
Surety. The person 0ho has pledged him or herself to pay bac) money or
perform a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral,
and as part of the original contract. CC <uhaime(s%a0 <ictionary.
17 a formal engagement 1as a pledge3 given for the fulfillment of an
underta)ing.
K7 one 0ho promises to ans0er for the debt or default of another.
$nder the $niform 4ommercial 4ode, ho0ever, a surety includes a
guarantor, and the t0o terms are generally interchangeable.
Merriam /ebster(s 8(ictionary of La# 8 119963.
,uarantor. # person 0ho pledges collateral for the contract of another, but separately,
as part of an independently contract 0ith the obligee of the original contract.
<uhaime(s %a0 <ictionary.
*t is not difficult to see that a stateCcreated @irth 4ertificate, 0ith an allCcaps,
name is a document evidencing debt the moment it is issued. Once a state has registered
a birth document 0ith the $.'. <epartment of 4ommerce, the <epartment notifies
the Treasury <epartment, 0hich ta)es out a loan from the 9ederal Geserve. The Treasury
uses the loan to purchase a bond 1the 9ed holds a =&urchase money security interest?
in the bond3 from the <epartment of 4ommerce, 0hich invests the sale proceeds in
the stoc) or bond mar)et. The Treasury <epartment then issues Treasury securities in
the form of Treasury @onds, !otes, and @ills using the bonds as surety for the
ne0 =securities.? This cycle is based on the future ta5 revenues of the legal person
0hose name appears on the @irth 4ertificate. This also means that the ban)rupt,
corporate $.'. can guarantee to the purchasers of their securities the lifetime labor and
ta5 revenues of every =citi0en of the +nited States?.#merican 0ith a @irth 4ertificate as
collateral for payment. This device is initiated simply by converting the la0ful,
true name of the child into a legal, -uristic name of a person.
Dubuque rei potissinia pars prineipium est > The principal part of everything is in the
beginning. 1=2ell begun is half done.?3
%egally, you are considered to be a slave or indentured servant to the various
9ederal, 'tate and local governments via your 'T#T&Cissued and 'T#T&Ccreated
@irth 4ertificate in the name of your allCcaps person. @irth 4ertificates are issued so that
the issuer can claim =e$clusi%e? title to the legal person created thereby. This is further
compounded 0hen one voluntarily obtains a <riverRs %icense or a 'ocial 'ecurity
#ccount !umber. The state even o0ns your personal and private life through your
'T#T&Cissued marriage license.certificate issued in the allCcaps names. Pou have no
rights in birth, marriage, or even death. The state holds title to all legal persons the state
creates via @irth 4ertificates until the rightful o0ner, i.e. you, reclaims.redeems it by
becoming the holder in due course of the instrument.
The main problem is that the mother and father, and then the eighteenCyearCold
man or 0oman, voluntarily agreed to this contrived system of plunder and slavery by
remaining silent > a legal default, latches, and failing to claim oneRs o0n Gights.
The ma5im of la0 becomes crucially operative7 =He #ho fails to assert his rights
has none.?
The legal rules and codes enforce themselves. There is no court hearing to
determine if those rules are correct. ;overnment rules are selfCregulating and
selfCsupporting. Once set into motion, such 8la#s8 automatically come into effect
provided the legal process has been follo0ed.
T5% 'a&io#6 ban$&#7tci%6
The legal person )no0n as the +"IT)( STAT)S is ban)rupt and holds no la0ful
4onstitutionally mandated silver or gold > gold coin or bullion > 0ith 0hich to bac)
any currency. #ll private held and federally held gold coins and bullion in #merica 0as
sei,ed via &5ecutive Order of #pril E, 19JJ and paid to the creditor, the private
9ederal Geserve 4orporation under the terms of the ban)ruptcy.
4ongress > still convening strictly under &5ecutive Order authority > confirmed
the ban)ruptcy through the Joint Gesolution to 'uspend the ;old 'tandard and #brogate
the ;old 4lause, June E, 19JJ, ouse Joint Gesolution 1JG3 19K, June E, 19JJ,
DJ
rd
4ongress, 1st 'ession , "ublic %a0 DJC10. This 19JJ public la0 states, in part7
8... every provision contained in or made 0ith respect to any obligation 0hich purports to
give the oblige a right to re6uire payment in gold or a particular )ind of coin or currency,
or in an amount in money of the $nited 'tates measured thereby, is declared to be against
public policy.8
The corporate $.'. declared ban)ruptcy a second time, 0hereby the
'ecretary of Treasury 0as appointed =3ecei%er? for the ban)rupt $.'.
in Georgani,ation "lan !o. K6 , Title E $'4 90J, "ublic %a0 92CE62,
8Legislati%e History,8 page E96D.
'ince 19JJ, the only =assets? used by the $!*T&< 'T#T&' to =&ay its debt?
to the 9ed have been the blood, s0eat, and tears of every #merican unfortunate to be
saddled 0ith a @irth 4ertificate and a 'ocial 'ecurity #ccount !umber
1the $.'. ;overnment must conceal this fact from the #merican people at all cost3.
Their future labor and ta5 revenues have been =legally? pledged via the ne0 allCcaps,
-uristicCperson names appearing on the @irth 4ertificates, i.e. the securities used as
collateral for loans of credit 1thinCair belief3 to pay daily operational costs,
reCorgani,ation e5penses in ban)ruptcy, insurance policy premiums re6uired to float the
ban)rupt government, and interest on the everCincreasing, 0holly fraudulent, debt.
A(( a76 L%=a( P%&6on '6. T5% La>+#( E%in=
Just 0ho or 0hat is the allCcaps person, i.e. =6!H" PA+L 6!")S,?
=6!H" P 6!")S,? or some other all capital letter corruption thereof+ *t is the entity the
government created to ta)e the place of the real being, i.e. John "aul Jones. The la0ful
4hristian name of birthright has been replaced 0ith a legal corporate name of deceit
and fraud. *f the la0ful 4hristian name ans0ers as the legal person, the t0o are
recogni,ed as being one and the same. o0ever, if the la0ful being distinguishes
himself.herself as a party other than the legal fiction, the t0o are separated.
# result of the federal ban)ruptcy 0as the creation of the =+"IT)( STAT)S,?
0hich 0as made a part of the legal reorgani,ation. The name of each 'T#T& 0as also
converted to its respective, allCcaps legal person, e.g. 'T#T& O9 <&%#/#G&.
These ne0 legal persons 0ere then used to create more legal persons, such as
corporations, 0ith allCcapital letters names, as 0ell. Once this 0as accomplished, the con
began to pic) up speed. #ll areas of government and all alleged =courts of la#,?
are de facto, =color of la# and right? institutions. The =CI3C+IT C!+3T !4
2A/") C!+"T/? and the =+.S. (IST3ICT C!+3T? can recogni,e and deal only 0ith
other legal persons. This is 0hy a la0ful name is never entered in their records.
The allCcaps legal person is used instead. Jurisdiction in such sham courts covers only
other artificial persons. The proper -urisdiction for a la0ful being is
a 4onstitutionally sanctioned, commonCla0Cvenue court. $nfortunately, such -urisdiction
0as =shel%ed? in 19JA and is no longer available. The only courts today are statutory
commercial tribunals collecting tribute 1plunder3 from the alleged 4reditors 0ho thin)
they have con6uered the country on their 0ay to ruling the 0orld.
"etition for Order in !ature of Mandamus
OG<&G ;G#!T*!; ;OM&G!M&!T(' MOT*O! TO <*'M*''
I$E*TIT? THEFT
by Clyde Ed+ard /o+ell
A >an"ary 49H9 . EE Febr"ary EFFA
The Federal Goernment and n"mero"s !tates hae passed la+s that
address the problem of identity theft'
The Identity Theft and Ass"mption $eterrence Act enacted by
Congress in 2ctober 499I %and codified, in part, at Title 49 )'!' Code
C 4FEI& is the federal la+ directed at identity theft'
#iolations of the act are inestigated by federal la+ enforcement
agencies, incl"ding %b"t not limited to& the )'!' !ecret serice, the
FBI, the )'!' /ostal Inspection !erice, and the !!A0s 2ffice of the
Inspector General' Federal identity theft cases are prosec"ted by the
)'!' $epartment of >"stice'
In most instances, a coniction for identity theft carries a ma1im"m
penalty of 4A years imprisonment, a fine, and forfeit"re of any
personal property "sed or intended to be "sed to commit the crime'
This Act also directs the )'!' !entencing Commission to reie+ and
amend the federal sentencing g"idelines to proide appropriate
penalties for those persons conicted of identity theft'
!chemes to commit identity theft or fra"d also may inole iolations
of other stat"tes, s"ch as credit card fra"dJ comp"ter fra"dJ mail
fra"dJ +ire fra"dJ financial instit"tion fra"dJ or !ocial !ec"rity fra"d'
Each of these federal offenses is a felony and carries s"bstantial
penalties . in some cases, as high as BF years in prison, fines, and
criminal forfeit"re'
What follo+s is a compilation of positie proofs that sho+ +hat is and
+hat is not a tr"e, complete, fact"al, and not misleading identification'
2ne +ill see that I hae isited many systems of la+, r"les of o"r
common lang"age, Goernment style directies, and many en"es' 2f
co"rse, in a fictitio"s name charge, one m"st start +ith a complete
and fact"al definition of name'
Name!Abbre"iation!a#ita$i%ation!INITIA&ISM!Idem
Sonans!'ictions
I am ma,ing the statement in this doc"ment that I am not a party to
this action' I hae made this statement d"e to the fact that I hae not
been specifically identified' It is ,no+n that a statement of this ,ind is
met +ith a lot of resistance from eery ("arter +ithin the Anglo.
American, /"blic, and Criminal /roced"re !ystem of -a+' This system
is dependent "pon the fact of the /riate Citi@en to 6ol"nteer6 to be
identified by a Goernment created /"blic 6name6' Goernment /"blic
citi@ens +ill een stoop to "sing i et armis, threats, d"ress, coercion,
false arrests %capt"re&, forced assignment of "nioni@ed co"rt officers
%6officers of the co"rt6&, criminal conersions, sec"rities fra"d, priate
property trespasses, trespasses "pon the -a+ of the case, e1tortion,
depriations of all manner and form, etc' This is "sed to maintain the
ill"sion of the 6ol"nteering6 of the /riate Citi@en of being identified
by a /"blic *ame' I hae already e1perienced the forcible sering of
alleged 6Co"rt6 doc"ments from an a"thority that is +itho"t
constit"tional basis, etc'
There remains one more f"ndamental doctrine to e1plore before +e
can contin"e' From a te1tboo, "sed in la+ schools that list
f"ndamental and r"dimentary principles of the science of la+ ery fe+
people hae the ,no+ledge that there e1ists in o"r Anglo.American
system of la+ t+o disconnected s"b.systems' First +e m"st properly
identify and define this so"rce of this little ,no+n fact'
6Hornboo(6
A primerJ
a boo, e1plaining the basics, f"ndamentals or r"diments of any
science or branch of ,no+ledge'0
6The phrase 6hornboo, la+6 is a collo("ial designation of the
r"diments or general principles of la+'6
. Blac,0s -a+ $ictionary :th ed'J pg' DBD'
It is +ithin this reference that it is fo"nd the names, types, and
;"risdictions of the /"blic -a+ and the /riate -a+'
6Anglo.American la+ has been separated into t+o main diisions
...)ub$ic &a*...
+hich has to do +ith the reg"lation of relations bet+een independent
states and bet+een a state and its %/"blic& citi@en, and0
6...)ri"ate &a*...
+hich reg"lates the relations bet+een the citi@ens of the state'6
. Handboo, on Common -a+ /leading, /age IJ >oseph H' =offler,
/rofessor of -a+, *e+ ?or, -a+ !chool and Alison Reppy, -ate $ean
and /rofessor of -a+, *e+ ?or, -a+ !chool West /"blishing Co'
%49IH&
As one can plainly see the /"blic -a+ only applies to those entities that
are commonly called 6creations of the state, or in this case, STATE'
!ome of these creat"res %state citi@ens& are ,no+n as incorporations,
m"nicipalities, committees, commissions, conferences, persons,
+hoeer, ta1payers, ;"st abo"t any and all that is fictionally created'
In other +ords, +hen it comes to citi@enship, all that is neither nat"ral
borne or nat"rali@ed' !ince this Citi@en clearly has been sho+n to be
liable only to the )ri"ate &a*, then it m"st be defined ho+ this
Citi@en is allo+ed to respond to damaging and in;"rio"s matters' This
too, is +ith this same boo,'
6K as the solemn and st"bborn fact is that Common.-a+ /leading still
s"ries as the basis of o"r 8odern Remedial -a+'
6While the *e+ R"les hae abolished the distinctie Common.-a+
Forms, the essential and differentiating r"les applicable to /leading as
established at Common -a+ still s"rie as a basis of Remedial -a+'
. Handboo, of Common -a+ /leading, =offler L Reppy, /age : West
/"blishing Co' %49IH&
The 6s"preme6 Common.-a+ states7
6K shall ma,e no la+ K abridging the K right of the people %/riate
Citi@ens& K to petition the Goernment for a redress of grieances'6
Article the third %First Amendment&, %6f"rther declaratory and
restrictie cla"ses6& Bill of Rights, Constit"tion for the )nited !tates of
America %4DDH.4D94&'
Name
It is eident that +e m"st address this matter as en"e, and, s"b;ect.
matter, and personam ;"risdictions +ill remain "n,no+n, "nless +e
can fact"ally establish identity of the parties in this matter' It is an
"ltimate /"blic fact that7
6Ka !oereign is not a 6person6 )nited 8ine Wor,ers s' )nited
!tates, BBF )'!' EAI'
What is a !oereign< Article I# of the Constit"tion mandates7
6The )nited !tates shall g"arantee to eery !tate in this )nion a
Rep"blican Form of Goernment,6
. Article I# !ection H Constit"tion for the )nited !tates of America
%4DDH.4D94&'
From that +e can no+ declare %as E )'!' +as in the )*ITE$ !TATE!
!)/RE8E C2)RT0s 6constit"tional period&7
6So"ereignty6
6K in o"r rep"blican forms of goernment the absol"te soereignty of
the nation is in the people 3/riate Citi@ens5 of the nation7 and the
resid"al soereignty of each state, not granted 3contracted5 to any of
its f"nctionaries, is in the people 3/riate Citi@ens5 of the stateJ6
3Emphasis mine5
. Chisholm s' Georgia, E )'!' %$all'& HD4 Bo"ier0s -a+ $ictionary,
Ith ed', /age BF9:'
2nce again in the )*ITE$ !TATE! !)/RE8E C2)RT0s constit"tional
period, +e learn from the positie proofs "sed in that era7
6If the K Goernment sho"ld oerpass the ;"st bo"nds of its a"thority,
and ma(e tyrannica$ use of its #o*ers+ the people +hose creat"re
it is m"st appeal to the standard they hae formed, and ta,e s"ch
meas"res to redress the in;"ry done to the Constit"tion K6 3Emphasis
mine5
. The Federalist /apers, Hamilton, *o' BB'
And finally, een state creat"res %incorporations, m"nicipalities,
fictions, color of la+G/"blic -a+, color of official rightGfalse
personators, etc'& are only liable +hen there fact"ally e1ist a bona fide
contract'
6The state citi%en is immune from any and all goernment attac,s
and proced"re, absent contract'6 3Emphasis mine5
. $red !cott s' !anford, :F )'!' %49 Ho+'& B9B'
!o a /riate, !entient, Ciilian, !oereign Citi@en is re("ired to e1act
la+f"l behaior, constit"tional compliance, and redress by petition,
those being both by Common.-a+ Form, and an Affidait in the form
of a petition'
It is, therefore, fact"al to say that by the "ltimate /"blic facts sho+n,
it is safe to say7
4& A !oereign is not a personJ
E& A !oereign is one of the /eople %We the /eopleG/riate, !entient,
Ciilian, !oereign Citi@ens&J
B& A /riate Citi@en is one of the /eopleJ
H& A /riate Citi@en, as +ell as a 6state citi@en6 %/"blic Citi@en, 6state6
creat"re& is imm"ne 6from any and all Goernment attac,s and
proced"res6, "nless there is a proced"rally proper and -a+f"l contract
presentJ
A& As the aboe is the definition of a /riate Citi@en, and not a 6state
and its citi@en %see the Handboo, of Common -a+ /leading, pg' I&, it
is fact"al to say that, in fact, a /riate Citi@en is only obligated to the
separated /riate -a+ and not the /"blic -a+'
As the definition of !oereign co"ld be constr"ed as fatal fla+ to all
the practices, proced"res and processes of any Goernment action, it
is adisable to contin"e to f"lly e1plore this s"b;ect' There remains the
introd"ction of the term 6person6' The historical bac,gro"nd of this
+ord is ancient, indeed' 2"r common lang"age +ord is based in the
romance lang"ages, that being 6persona6' What is a 6persona6<
)ersona %-atin&
6In its original signification,
a mas,, K is e1tended to the dead K
a stat"e in a fo"ntain K a s$a"e K
Roman la+yers sometimes "se persona so as to incl"de slaes'6
3Emphasis mine5
. Bo"ier0s -a+ $ictionary, Ith ed', pg' EADA'
This is the ancient system of 6No"ation6 +here "pon the capt"ring of
a nation by the Roman Army, all citi@ens had a persona attached to
them' This not only represented their s"b;ection and enslaement to
the Roman Canon -a+ %/"blic&, b"t also +as an act"al identification of
a prisoner of +ar to be pl"ndered' The birth of >es"s in Bethlehem +as
dependant "pon the obedience to the Roman Canon -a+ %/"blic -a+&'
)erson, n' per0sn'
3-' personaJ said to be compo"nded of per, thro"gh or by, and sonas,
so"ndJ a -atin +ord signifying a mas, "sed by actors on the state'5
I' In la+, an artificial person, is a corporation or body politic'6
. Webster0s 4IEI $ictionary, $' Webster %4IEI&'
In o"r common lang"age as far bac, as 4IEI it has been a fact that,
in -a+, a 6person6 is 6artificial6'
6Artificia$ #erson6
A s"b;ect of d"ties and rights +hich is represented by one or more
nat"ral persons %generally, not necessarily, by more than one& b"t
does not coincide +ith them' It has a contin"o"s legal e1istence not
necessarily depending on any nat"ral lifeJ this legal contin"ity ans+ers
to some real contin"ity of p"blic f"nctions or of special p"rpose
recogni@ed as haing p"blic "tility or of some la+f"l common interest
of the nat"ral persons concerned' 3Emphasis mine5
. Bo"ier0s -a+ $ictionary, Ith ed', pg' EAE'
Artificia$
Created by art, or by la+J
e1isting by force of or in contemplation of la+'6
. Blac,0s -a+ $ictionary, End ed', pg' 9E'
It is therefore fact"al to say that a 6person6 thro"gho"t the history of
o"r common lang"age has al+ays meant a Goernment created fiction
%artificial& s"b;ect to the /"blic -a+, /"blic )tility, or /"blic F"nction'
The only e1ception is by 6la+f"l common interest6 3Common.-a+
Contract%s&5' !ee o"r la+f"l common interestsJ the Constit"tion for the
)nited !tates of America %4D:H.4D94&, and in my case, the
Constit"tion for The !tate of Ar,ansas %4IB: to $ate&' C"rrent attac,s
by the creations of the /"blic -a+ or by its /"blic !erants in the name
of its fictions %personaGpersonG+hoeerGetc'& or other+ise is absent
contract' And by s"preme and binding declaration in the )*ITE$
!TATE! !)/RE8E C2)RT, at $red !cott, +e hae learned that
absol"te imm"nity is dictated +here a proced"rally proper and la+f"l
contract is lac,ing een in the case of a state created fiction'
6A name is +ord or +ords "sed to disting"ish and identify a #erson6
3Emphasis mine5
.*ame, :A C'>'!' C 4, pg' 4'
C'>'!' are the +idely recogni@ed initials of Corp"s >"ris !ec"nd"m
%According to the Body of -a+& and this is the embodiment of the
/"blic -a+, +ith some /riate -a+ thro+n in' It is from this that +e
can be identified' -et0s loo, to the -a+ $ictionaries to find meaning in
6person6, that +hich possesses a 6name6 %/"blic&'
6)erson6
A man considered according to the ran, he holds in society, +ith all
the right to +hich the place he holds entitles him, and the d"ty +hich
it imposes' It may incl"de 3limited to5 artificial beings, as corporations
K territorial corporations K foreign corporations K relating to ta1ation
and reen"e la+s K MI# Amendment 6persons6 K A co"nty K a slae K
estate of a decedent K a ;"dge holding co"rt K an infant 3Ward of the
Co"rt5 K officers, partnerships, and +omen K participants in the
forbidden acts 36defendants6 L 6plaintiffs65 K agents, officers, and
members of the board of directors or tr"stees, or their controlling
bodies, of corporations K the legal s"b;ect 3s"b;ect.matter5 or
s"bstance 3remJ res5 K6 3Emphasis mine5
. Bo"ier0s -a+ $ictionary, Ith ed', pg' EADH'
It is no+ fact"al to say, p"rs"ant to the )*ITE$ !TATE! !)/RE8E
C2)RT, the Body of /"blic -a+, o"r Common lang"age, etc' that a
!oereign is not a personJ a person has a nameJ and, therefore, a
!oereign has not an all capitalGacronymicalGabbreiation *A8E
%/"blic&' This seems to fly in the face of logic, beca"se it is the
common pres"mption that eeryone has a name' $oes this principle
incl"de those identifications ,no+n as Common.-a+ or Christian
6names6< Are and ho+ are these different< -et0s address the latter
firstly'
As 6This is a Christian *ation6 4:I )'!' :EA and 6The Bible is -a+ to
be applied nationally6 BIF )'!' 4:B it is easily seen that $iine -a+
holds a place in s"premacy, een oer the 6s"preme -a+ of the -and6,
constit"tional CommonGE("ity.-a+' It +as the Christian d"ty of my co.
creators to gie to me +ords that +o"ld foreer be "sed to recogni@e
me' These are the same +ords that +ere "sed at my Baptism into the
=ingdom of Heaen' As this is a g"aranteed freedom "nder o"r
national contracts, specifically at the Article the Third %First
Amendment& of the 6f"rther declaratory and restrictie cla"ses6 of the
Constit"tion for the )nited !tates of America %4D:H.4D94&' All /"blic
!erants are re("ired to s+ear or affirm their +ord, sec"re +ith their
BondG!"rety %before ta,ing office or compensations&, and ma,e a
binding Common.-a+ contract that ma,es this tr"ly a g"arantee to all
/riate Citi@ens and not merely a bare assertion' If anyone or anything
+o"ld try to change the Christian $octrine of my property, commonly
called my Christian name, then they or that +o"ld be g"ilty of
establishing a conflicting form of religion that +o"ld hae to gie
eidence to the s"periority to my Christian beliefs' It is easily seen
that this +o"ld be an impossible tas,' We m"st address the possibility
that someone or something may try to accomplish this +holly anti.
Christian action'
6If the Christian name be +holly mista,en, this is reg"larly fatal to all
legal instr"ments, as +ell declarations and pleadings as grants and
obligationsJ and the reason is, beca"se it is rep"gnant to the Christian
religion that there sho"ld be a Christian +itho"t a name of baptism, or
that person sho"ld hae t+o Christian names, since o"r ch"rch allo+s
of no re.bapti@ingJ and therefore if a person enters into a bond by a
+rong Christian name, he cannot be declared against by the name in
the obligation, and his tr"e name bro"ght in an alias, for that
s"pposes the possibility of t+o Christian namesJ and yo" cannot
declare against the party by his right name, and aer he made the
deed by his +rong nameJ for that is to set "p an aerment contrary to
the deedJ and there is the sanction allo+ed to eery solemn contract,
that it cannot be opposed b"t by a thing of e("al alidityJ and if he
impleaded by the name in the deed, he may plead that he is another
person, and that it is not his deed'6
. A *e+ Abridgement of the -a+, 8atthe+ Bacon, #ol' III %4IH:&'
It sho"ld go +itho"t saying that the 6person6 referred to in the aboe
("ote is a Christian, and I do not beliee that anyone or anything has
eer maintained that a Christian is s"b;ect to the Goernment, or a
creation thereto, since the Goernment is fo"ndationally based in
Christian $octrine' As +e can easily see, it is impossible to be
recogni@ed by t+o names and maintain yo"r belief str"ct"re of being a
Christian' It is obio"s that the $iine d"ty of the gift of the +ords
"sed to recogni@e the Christian and the one time only solemnity of
being +ashed clean and emerging as a ne+ creation %baptism& has no
option in regards to changing horses in the middle of the stream' If
anyone or anything sho"ld try to change s"ch things, then +e are left
+ith rep"gnancy and blasphemy of o"r Christian beliefs' If someone or
something sho"ld then try and force a different recognition "pon yo"
thro"gh i et armis, threat, d"ress, etc' then yo" hae identified,
defined, and e1posed an anti.Christian, despot, and tyrant' Therefore,
if a /riate Citi@en is Christian, then, and only "pon commission of a
Common.-a+ crime %damage or in;"ry against another Citi@en or their
/roperty&, can the Christian be made the ob;ect of some actionJ and
only in his Christian name'
6The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in
a legal process preents the co"rt from ac("iring ;"risdiction, K6
. Bo"ier0s -a+ $ictionary, Ithed', pg' EEID
Ret"rning to the former s"b;ect, the Common.-a+ name is merely the
d"ty of the parents to assign, and in these nations, this is normally the
Christian *ame'
We m"st re.address the scheme that +as ,no+n to the Romans as
6*oation6' As 6*oation6 is nothing other than +hen the Romans
militarily con("ered a nation, they assigned to the Citi@ens, thereto, a
6persona6' This persona +hen bro"ght before the Roman co"rts +as
re("ired to see, 6co"nsel6 as a persona is +itho"t the corporal
herediments re("ired to defend itself' These co"rts +ere in act"ality
nothing other than =ing0s Bench, Cons"lar, 8ilitary co"rts that +ere
operating "nder maritimeGadmiralty hypothecations'
I only mention this beca"se of all the parallels that hae been dra+n
into o"r c"rrently practiced form of Goernment today' 8as,s are
created to hide from ie+ the /riate Citi@en' There are goernment
agencies that can only deal in these mas,s' )nder the 6Alien Enemy
/rogram6 these mas,s are described internationally as 6nom de
g"erre6'
6Nom de guerre6
6%F' +ar name&7 a fictitio"s name7 /se"donym
. Third *e+ International $ictionary of the English -ang"age, 8erriam.
Webster, pg' 4ABH'
)nder International -a+, all parties to a ca"se m"st appear by nom de
g"erre, beca"se an 6alien enemy cannot maintain an action d"ring the
+ar in his o+n name6' !ee Alien, Wharton0s, /ennsylania $igest, C
EF'9H and the 21ford English $ictionary, End' ed', Clarendon /ress
%49I9&' It is by International $octrine that the "se of nom de g"erre
+o"ld indicate a state of +ar' Is it by the Goernment0s "se of
personas, nom de g"erre, artificial persons, fictitio"s names, etc' +ith
the enforcement of obedience %military ;"risdiction& by i et armis that
+e can ,no+ that the Goernment, /"blic -a+, /"blic !erants are
+aging +ar against the /riate Citi@en< Is this done in spite of the
Common.-a+ contracts that are a matter of /"blic record that the
/riate Citi@en has in regards to each and eery /"blic !erant< The
facts in this matter seem to bear this o"t' As a matter of fact, an
e1ha"stie description of this 6economic +ar6 against the /riate
Citi@ens of the )nited !tates of America can be fo"nd in the $igest of
International -a+, #ol"me 4F, and pages 9A.4ED' It is here that +e
+ill find that the $epartments of !tate, >"stice, Commerce, and the
Treas"ry, in disregard to the administratie orders of the /resident,
cond"ct an 6Alien Enemy /rogram6 +hose sole p"rpose is to
"nconstit"tionally sei@e the properties of all /riate Citi@ens, militarily,
+ith the aid of s"ch maritime hypothecations as 6bottomry bonds6,
etc'
Abbre"iation
A reie+ of the 6Federal6 Goernment doctrines regarding names
reeals the follo+ing7
Abbre"iations
$o not abbreiate the first +ord of a party0s name, "nless the f"ll
name of a party can be abbreiated to +idely recogni@ed initials7
Internal Reen"e !erice I,S
Federal Trade Commission 'T
International B"siness 8achines IBM
. )nited !tates !tyle 8an"al, E.E %d&J Goernment /rinting 2ffice
%-)O&'
As it is the d"ty to gie the proced"res for +riting all doc"ments of the
goernment, in all its branches, it is safe to say that the G/2 is the
most li,ely so"rce of information on this s"b;ect of e1pressed
identification' Admittedly, there is a section +ithin the )nited !tates
!tyle 8an"al that deals +ith co"rt doc"ments and ho+ they are to be
+ritten' It is reealed that e1pressions of 6/laintiffs6 and 6$efendants6
%/articipants in forbidden actsJ artificial persons& +ill be in the all
"pper case form' B"t if section E.E %d& is to be belieed, then +e m"st
rely on the 6+idely recogni@ed6 characteristics of s"ch e1pressions'
What is meant by 6+idely recogni@ed6< $oes this mean that certain
/eople are e1cl"ded from this recognition< $oes it mean that certain
/eople are incapable of this recognition< 8"st yo" be priy to s"ch
recognitions< Can only la+yers, ;"dges, cler,s, policemen, assessors,
ta1 collectors, etc' "nderstand this recognition< Is this a foreign
lang"age that m"st be interpreted to the /riate Citi@en< Has the
Goernment 6by the /eople6 created alter egos to all the /riate
Citi@ens that they are responsible for< Is this a form of 6*oation6< Is
it the Goernment0s policy 6I0ll tell yo" +ho yo" are and I +ill choose
+hat yo" are so that I may attac, yo" and yo"r property at my +ill,
irregardless of the /riate -a+< $oes s"ch a"thority e1ist in the
Goernment, or m"st this be held strictly by i et armis<
All eidences indicate that a system of 6*oation6 still e1ists to this
day +ithin the present alleged 6goernment6' In order to be 6+idely
recogni@ed6, there m"st be a constit"tional obligation "pon the /riate
Citi@en or a contract"al obligation "pon the fiction ,no+n as a
6stateG!TATE s"b;ect.citi@en %see Fo"rteenth Amendment&' The point
is that there +ill be doc"mentation that +ill sho+ these proced"res' *o
/riate citi@en can eer be recogni@ed by 6Beca"se I say so6' To carry
s"ch belief is despotic and tyrannical, and maybe een treasono"s and
comm"nistic' This is not +hat the G/2 meant in its p"blications, and
there e1ists no conflict bet+een its sections'
!imply stated, the G/2 has recogni@ed the separation of the /"blic
-a+ and /riate -a+ in o"r Anglo.American -a+ system' The G/20s
statement is that /riate Citi@ens identifications cannot be an
6Abbreiation6, and the parties to a ;"dicial process of /"blic -a+
cannot be /riate Citi@ens' In other +ords it is impossible to identify a
/riate Citi@en as a 6/laintiff6 or 6$efendant6 in any of the 6Federal6 or
6!TATE6 6co"rts6, as s"ch identifications are artificial %fictitio"s&'
a#ita$i%ation
We m"st no+ e1plore the r"les of o"r Common lang"age' The
identities of all things are ,no+n as 6*o"ns6' This incl"des /eople,
/laces %en"e&, and Things %inanimate&' !pecific identification is
accomplished thro"gh 6/roper *o"ns6' In the Harbrace College
Handboo,, The 8cGra+.Hill College Handboo,, the Reference
Handboo, of Grammar and )sage, The 21ford $ictionary of English
Grammar, The 8cGra+.Hill !tyle 8an"al, and The Gregg Reference
8an"al, are all boo,s dealing +ith the r"les of grammar to o"r
common lang"age, there can be fo"nd no reference that gies an all
"pper case lettered /roper *o"n' It is also stated by these grammar
boo,s that something that is all "pper case lettered is merely 6initials6
+hich are a representation of something else'
INITIA&ISM
In order for a gro"p of initials to ma,e any sense, it m"st be ,no+n
+hat each "pper case letter represents' Ta,e the follo+ing e1ample
6+ysi+yg6' I dare say that o"t of one h"ndred %4FF& /eople, yo" +o"ld
be l"c,y to find ten %4F& that +o"ld ,no+ its meaningJ 6What yo" see
is +hat yo" get6, a comp"ter term' The proliferation of the comp"ter
has res"lted in an "nofficial lang"age, +hich is 6I*ITIA-I!86' Which
as,s the ("estionJ does the Goernment no+ practice the lang"age of
6I*ITIA-I!86< As I type on this comp"ter, its 6spell chec,er6
recogni@es I*ITIA-I!8, b"t not *oation, and, by Goernment
practice, are they not the same< If yo" hae the occasion to hae yo"r
identity spelled incorrectly indicating an artificial person, and as,ed
that it be corrected, and the response is that this is the only +ay it can
be spelled, then hae yo" not discoered +hether yo" are being
identified as a /riate Citi@en, or a creation of the state< Is it not
fact"al to say that any agency of Goernment that is "nable to correct
s"ch an error has been established only for the p"rposes of dealing
+ith artificial persons, /"blic Citi@ens and not /riate Citi@ens< This
+o"ld incl"de, b"t not be limited to, all ;"dicial doc"ments %remember
the G/2&, all licenses, all ta1ation, all credit instr"ments, ban,ing, mail
deliery, etc' 6I*ITIA-I!86 deals +ith acronyms'
acronym
4 6!trictly, a +ord formed from %a& the initial letters of other +ords, or
from %b& a mi1t"re of initials and syllables'
%a& 6*AT2 %N*orth Atlantic Treaty 2rgani@ation& *I8B? %Nnot in my
bac, yard& TI*A %Nthere is no alternatie&
%b& 6radar N %radio detection and ranging& y"ppie N %yo"ng "rban
professional O dimin"tie ending&
sometimes incl"ded in the term ABBRE#IATI2*'
E 8ore loosely, an ABBRE#IATI2* prono"nced as a string of letters,
especially letters that stand for the name of an organi@ation or
instit"tion, e'g' BBC, )!A'
6This "sage may be d"e to the fact that the specific term for this type
abbreiation %I*ITIA-I!8& is not +idely ,no+n'6 3Emphasis mine5
. The 21ford $ictionary of English Grammar, !' Wal,er L E' Weiner
%499H&
All the other grammar boo,s also recogni@e acronyms for +hat they
are, initial letters of +ords either strictly formed or more loosely as an
abbreiation' !o in this matter are +e to beliee that THE !TATE 2F
AR=A*!A! is the strict formation of the initial letters of +ords, or
loosely the formation of an abbreiation< In either case, the meaning
of this identification is, fact"ally, 6not +idely ,no+n6' And it is no
stretch of the imagination to erify the G/20s statement that
abbreiations, the more loosely formed abbreiation, m"st be 6+idely
recogni@ed6'
There is a common test that e1ists that sho"ld sho+ anyone +hether
they are dealing +ith a tr"e prono"n name or merely a fictional,
artificial identification' As an e1ample, let0s ta,e >ohn >ames, $oe and
its fictional +ant.to.be >2H* >A8E! $2E' *o+, simply, try to c"rsiely
+rite >2H* >A8E! $2E' All +ill soon see that it is an impossibility' If
one +o"ld remember bac, to their school days and their Big Chief
Tablets and fat pencils, yo" +o"ld remember that +hen starting to
learn to +rite, there +ere t+o @ones per line' The lo+er and "pper
@ones +ere for capital letters %"pper case&, and the lo+er @one +as for
small letters %lo+er case&' When +e adanced to +riting c"rsiely, +e
learned that there +ere some capital letters that did not end +here it
+as conenient for a smooth transfer into a small letter, let alone a
capital one' C"rsie +riting is not cond"cie to all capital letters, and,
therefore, their e1ists no signat"re that can be prod"ced that +ill sho+
that >2H* >A8E! $2E is legitimate in any +ay, let alone being able to
prod"ce an original signat"re positiely proing the same' ?o" do not
hae to be a hand+riting e1pert to obsere this fatal fla+ to >2H*
>A8E $2E' In other +ords, the letters may be the same in these t+o
representations, b"t o"r lang"age does not allo+ for an original
signat"re of >2H* >A8E! $2E'
Idem Sonans
The last h"rdle +e m"st climb in o"r identification of the parties in A*?
action is a test called 6Idem !onans6' This is the one and only test of a
name that can be fo"nd and once more this test is not the priilege of
alleged false personators claiming to be /"blic !erants'
Idem Sonans
a' In General
6If names so"nd ali,e, or s"bstantially ali,e, they are "s"ally regarded
as the same, altho"gh spelled differently, and the ariance in their
spelling is considered immaterial'
6With respect to names, the phrase 6idem sonans6 means 6of the same
so"nd6' The general r"le is that the la+ %/"blic& does not regard the
spelling of names as m"ch as it does their so"nd'
Great latit"de is allo+ed in the pron"nciation and spelling of proper
names, since proper names are often spelled differently, altho"gh
prono"nced the same %Terry.Terri&'
6If they so"nd ali,e, or een if common "sage %+idely ,no+n& has
made their pron"nciation identical, they are regarded as the same and
a ariance in their spelling is immaterial, "nless it is s"ch as misleads
a person to his pre;"dice, or the misspelling transforms the name into
a +holly distinct appellation'6 %Emphasis mine&
. :A C'>'!' C 4H %a&, *ames, pg' B:'
!ame so"nding names disc"ssed aboe are li,e Terry and Terri, not
Terry and TERR?, as the latter is not a /roper *ame, b"t an
abbreiationGacronymGI*ITIA-I!8' -ets loo, to proper pron"nciation
any+ay' /ron"nciations are fo"nd in most dictionaries' 2ne of the
+ords "sed to recogni@e the aforementioned e1ample is the +ord
>ohn' Its pron"nciation is 0>Pn' Whereas, "pon close e1amination of
the doc"ments of Goernment, creditors, bill collectors, co"rts, etc'
reeals the +ord >2H*' >"st as Tina represents a name, TI*A means,
6there is no alternatie6 and tho"gh they may be p"rported as
so"nding the same, they are ery different in meaning' I hae gone to
a fie %A&.ol"me acronym dictionary and loo,ed "p >2H*' I hae
fo"nd no meaning, either strictly or loosely' )sing the pron"nciation
tables in the dictionary I hae managed to define the pron"nciation of
>2H*' It pron"nciation is 0>P 02 0Ach 0En' It is obio"s from o"r basic
principles of o"r common lang"age that >ohn and >2H* do not so"nd
the same, as there is no acronymical a"thority to the contrary' !o
+hat is >2H*< It co"ld be a corporation, a essel, a comp"ter term,
etc' It is not +idely recogni@ed or ,no+n, and, therefore, according to
the G/2 an improper abbreiation' This is nothing other than an
appearance of legitimacy %legal&' By the free +ill and deed of these
a"thorities, the e1ception cla"se of the 6Idem !onans6 test m"st be
ino,ed' It is obio"sly stated7
6K "nless it is s"ch as misleads a person to his pre;"dice, or the
misspelling transforms the name into a +holly distinct appellation'6
. :A C'>'!' C 4H %a&, *ame, pg' B:'
This is tr"ly a +holly distinct appellation, as official so"rces of
reference and information does not identify, describe, or define >2H*'
And if it is left to 6Beca"se I say !o6, then this is hearsay and again it
is disallo+ed %R"les of Eidence&' The doc"ment of the "n,no+n thing,
s"ch as an 6indictmentGinformation6 calling itself THE !TATE 2F
AR=A*!A!, for e1ample, is fatally fla+ed in its definition of the /"blic
-a+ entities described as 6/laintiff6 and $efendant6'
F"rther, 6according to the body of la+6 %C'>'!'& there is only one test
of names ,no+n as 6Idem !onans6' This test is +ell beyond the
a"thority of any ;"dge' This means 6beca"se I say so, is an "nla+f"l,
infantile, and friolo"s defense to "sing fictitio"s names' As a matter
of fact, the 6body of la+6 states the follo+ing7
6The ("estion of idem sonans is essentially a ("estion of fact'
6Generally &constit"tionally& it is a ("estion of fact for the ;"ry to
decide "nder proper instr"ctions from the co"rt %!eeJ R"le EF4%d&,
Fed'R'Eid'&, and it ta,es a ery fair case to gie it application as a
matter of la+'6
. Rodrig"e@ s !tate, B:B !'W'Ed HDEJ >ones s' !tate, ED !'W'Ed
:AB'
6The ("estion +hether or not names are idem sonans is properly a
("estion for the ;"ry K it has been held that the ("estion is for the
;"ry +here it arises on the eidence 3R"le EF4%d&5'6 3Emphasis mineQ
. :A C'>'!' *ames, C 4:, pg' A4'
For an alleged ;"dge to state that it is his opinion that >ohn and >2H*
are the same, is called the federal and state felony ,no+n as
6/racticing -a+ from the Bench0, especially +hen this alleged ;"dge
finds it impossible to prod"ce any positie proof, +hatsoeer, to proe
his opinion, li,e an original signat"re of >2H*, or een merely the
physical presence of >2H*'
In all 6Co"rt0s6 headings, +e find that the secret, concealing, fictitio"s,
foreign, "nofficial lang"age of 6I*ITIA-I!86 is "sed e1tensiely' As
this is a foreign lang"age, the la+ proides the proced"res needed for
its interpretations' We find7
d' Abbre"iations
$o not abbreiate the first +ord of a party0s name, "nless the f"ll
name of a party can be abbreiated to +idely recogni@ed initials7
Internal Reen"e !erice I,S
Federal Trade Commission 'T
International B"siness 8achines IBM
. )nited !tates !tyle 8an"al, E.E %d&
$oes anybody ,no+ +hat the second initial of >2H* stands for and is it
easily recogni@ed< If this is to be a representation of a name, lets
e1plore the follo+ing' )sing +hat these A-- CA/! a"thorities "se, then
TI*A is a name' *ot soR
6According to the Body of -a+6 %Corp"s >"ris !ec"nd"m&, this matter
is e1ha"stiely disc"ssed' As a matter of fact it states7
In general, in the absence of stat"tory prohibition, ;"dicial inhibition,
or fra"d, a person, +itho"t abandoning his real name, may adopt or
ass"me any name, +holly or partly different from his name, by +hich
he may become ,no+n, transact b"siness, e1ec"te alid and binding
contracts, and carry on his affairs'
6The "se of fictitio"s names is not, ho+eer, to be enco"raged since it
lends itself readily to fra"d beca"se of the concealment inoled and is
li,ely to be "sed against the p"blic interests K
6The aerage person ie+s +ith s"spicion any "se of a fictitio"s name,
and its ery "se p"ts on notice a person +ho has ,no+ledge of s"ch
"se that there is a p"rpose to conceal something'
6If it inoles a p"blic official K there is eery reason to concl"de that
the motie is not in the p"blic interest'
. :A C'>'!' *ames, C 9%4&, pgs 4B.4H'
What can +e concl"de from all these references that are mentioned<
Is it fair to concl"de that any /riate Citi@en that faces an a"thority
that is insistent "pon the "se of fictitio"s *A8E! has relin("ished any
and all a"thority that may hae been present since this a"thority has
ass"med the d"ties of a ;"ry, and is desperate to conceal the tr"th<
Are +e bo"nd to obey s"ch despicable a"thorities, een if they commit
ciil andGor criminal iolence to ins"re o"r obedience to their secret,
"nla+f"l, anti.Christian and "nconstit"tional demands< It is ("ite
obio"s, that anyone belieing that fictitio"s *A8E! are the "ltimate
fact leaes one only to ("estion the patriotism, the +ord, the
constit"tional integrity, the po+er and a"thority of the ;"ry, and the
religio"s toleration of these fictitio"s *A8E creators, and as a matter
of good citi@enship to dismiss any implied a"thority or po+ers of said
creat"res and their creators, and if necessary for the /"blic /eace to
remoe foreer any and all practitioners of this despicable behaior'
As can be seen from this e1ha"stie treatise, there cannot be fo"nd
absol"tely any reason that +o"ld ;"stify this, in fact, this attempted
identity theft and mail fra"d' This Citi@en ,no+s that it is not the
primary responsibility to prosec"te any crimes, b"t een a c"rsory
inestigation +ill reeal m"ltiple felonies or een higher crimes'
This Citi@en is merely trying to behae, as any good Citi@en +o"ld do'
This Citi@en ,no+s that yo" can0t be eery+here at once, and m"st
rely on "s Citi@ens to help yo" ferret o"t those +ho +o"ld try to
destroy o"r +ay of life, o"r form of Goernment, o"r s"preme -a+,
and, in this case, o"r freedom of +orship' If there be any reason for
yo" re("iring any f"rther assistance from this Citi@en, please do not
hesitate to contact this Citi@en' This Citi@en is aailable to help la+f"l
and honorable /"blic !erants at any time'
I declare "nder the penalties of per;"ry, p"rs"ant to the -a+s of the
)nited !tates of America that the foregoing is tr"e, correct, complete,
and not misleading'
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
AmericanGAr,ansanJ ChristianJ
/riate, !entient, Ciilian, !oereign Citi@en7
)nited !tates of America, a Rep"blicJ
The !tate of Ar,ansas, a Rep"blic7
Co"nty of Washington7
To+nship TWithinU'
6K at the mo"ths of t+o, or at the mo"ths of three the matter is
established'6 $e"teronomy 4974A
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
$iine and Common -a+ Witness $iine and Common -a+ Witness
End of $oc"ment
C-IC= HERE for print copy'
!ee CITIVE*0! TREATI!E by Clyde Ed+ard /o+ell
!ee THE W2R$ 8A!TER for dictionary reso"rces'
!ee e.legalnotice e.legalnotice is a ne+ company dedicated to cost
effectie, fast, and sec"re posting of legal and p"blic notices for
priate indiid"als, legal firms, and b"sinesses'
!ee #eri!ign $oc"ment !igner A digital signat"re is to an electronic
doc"ment +hat a hand+ritten signat"re is to a paper doc"ment'
The )nited !tates Goernment /rinting 2ffice !tyle 8an"al EFFF